My kids received services from our county’s department of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities for years. It has only been since early 2010 that Ohio dropped the MR from MRDD in its various agencies. (The legislation was adopted in October, 2009). It was the polite term used by the American Association on Mental Retardation until they changed their name, in 2006, to the American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
I think that such efforts are well-intentioned. I have no problem changing my vocabulary. On the other hand, I suspect that it is little more than playing whack-a-mole. As already noted, retarded, (literally “slowed”), replaced a host of “scientific” words such as moron and imbecile that were coined to avoid using words such as dummy or fool or feeble minded.
In some ways, I am disappointed. It will probably only be a few years, possibly months, before “DD” or DevDis or some similar construction will replace REE-tard on the playgrounds. With this change as an example, that newly coined insult will send the various social service agencies and mental health professionals haring off on the search for a new word. While retarded in this sense was coined in 1895, I do not know when it became the common word referring to those of impaired mental capacities. REE-tard was already a playground insult when I was a kid in the 1950s. So retarded/retardation survived as the polite word for over 50 years. I only heard the first mutterings that it was impolite some time after 2000, (which came as a surprise to me since every agency with whom I had contact was still using the term). So, we have now had a fairly rapid turnover for a very established term that did not increase in its pejorative nature for over fifty years.
Rather than holding the line and simply letting that situation continue, by jumping on the “It has become an insult” bandwagon, they have bought into the rather futile idea that we can ever come up with a name for such conditions that will not immediately become insults. We are going to chase our tails, forever, in attempting to find an non-insulting term or phrase. (When schools started identifying kids as having “special needs,” it was a matter of months, (perhaps weeks), until the taunt “you’re SPESHul” was heard across the land.
In a related matter, referring to the OP, I see no reason why Maher should have had some a priori knowledge of the change in terminology. I still hear the phrase used by professionals (who grew up in an environment when it was the polite phrase), and I do not recall any bold headlines announcing the new terminology. I only discovered that it was no longer polite when I saw the sign in front of my MRDD office changed to DD–and then had to go look up the legislation changing the name for the state of Ohio. For the most part, knowledge of the change has been passed on by people whispering “that is rude” to other people who were unaware of the change.
Of course, in a polite world, Maher, on being apprised of the change in terminology, would have issued an immediate apology and retraction, noting that he was unaware of the change. Somehow, I doubt that that is how Maher played this one.