There seems to be a lot of books with titles like:
1.* The Miller’s Daughter*
The Astronaut’s Wife
The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo.
The Girl on the Train.
Is there a name for this type of title? Where a character is identified by some characteristic? Are 1 & 2 different from 3 & 4? The first two are identified by their relationship to someone else.
And finally, is it my imagination, or are there a lot more titles like this referring to women than there are referring to men?
I would bet the usual virtual wooden nickel that somewhere there is a thesis or dissertation exploring the history and nomenclature of such titles. Hasta be.
There’s probably a study about this, somewhere. (I’d look now, but time is short at the moment.)
It’s a rather clever titling strategy, in that it offers a bit of plot right off the bat. For example, “The Stone” tells you that a stone is involved in some way, but “The Stone’s Wife” gets you wondering about several things (potentially): is The Stone a person, or an object, or an alien, or what? What is the backstory behind this marriage–is it an actual marriage, or a metaphor? What is going to happen to the marriage in the story itself? …And so on.
Several of these are books originally published in another language. Perhaps they had a pleasant sound in Swedish, et. al.
Personally, I find these titles irritatingly unmemorable.
Interesting question. You could add The French Lieutenant’s Woman to the list. I haven’t read the books in question. Are the protagonists the female characters - the daughter, the wife, the woman - who are supposedly the title’s subject? Or are the protagonists the male characters these women are defined by - the miller, the astronaut, the French lieutenant?
Generic description of a person (son, daughter, wife, girl, man) with only a little more specific qualifier. The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo is a little more specific than the others in my mind. It is a good formula for titles, makes me want to find out the specifics. Obviously characteristics are different than relationships but it’s fine distinction on the general theme.