Is there a reason CalD's GD thread is still going on?

Seriously.

LINK

So far, CalD has shown an unwillingness to read any of the cites posters have provided, and basically strung out a 300 post monstrosity by rebutting with “nuh-uh!” over and over again. When he/she doesn’t do that, they respond with gibberish, “My post is my Cite” bullshit. I Know that GD is the place for witnessing and religiously loaded debates, but there doesn’t seem to be any debate going on at all. The whole thread reads like a troll just stringing posters along, if not building a basis for the next smug glurgy “professor vs student” type chain-mail to go around:

Either CalD has nothing to bring to the table, or he/she is a troll. Why let it go on?

Can I get a copy of the atheist agenda? I’m still waiting for my copy of the gay agenda. I need an agenda, I can’t cope without one; I don’t know what is expected of me. For all I know, I may be gay; without an agenda, how can I tell if I am or not?

Didn’t you get the minutes from last weeks’ meeting? They were sent around in the memo. Your agenda was attached.

I never like to throw such accusations around, what with ‘don’t attribute to malice what can equally well be explained by stupidity’ and all, but if that thread’s not blatant trolling – at least by now, even if it didn’t start out as such – then I don’t know what is. I simply don’t want to believe anybody could be that dense.

I, for one, actually agree with one of his main points-his “creator” is immaterial.

:smiley:

It’s almost like he’s made a careful study of all the debating styles on the SDMB and posted in such a way as to be confrontational to as many of them as possible.

What the hell is “sensical”, anyway? Is CalD going to post a new thread asking if getting a backrub is more gruntling than getting your feet tickled next?

“1) Don’t get killed; 2) a decent brunch. That’s it!” - Elvira Kurt

"1) Full civil rights. Gay marriage, gay adoption, anti-discrimination laws, gays in the military, gay scouts, gay police, gay teachers, and anything else we can think of to frighten Pat Buchanan.
"2) We want the national anthem to come out in a 25-minute dance version.
“I think that’s very reasonable.”

  • Bob Smith

Sorry, we couldn’t print the agendas this year. We spent all our money putting ads on London’s buses. Would you settle for a Jewish agenda?

The thread started out in IMHO. Maybe the problem is that the rest of you are too smart.
Try approaching CalD’s argument as if it were a thread about cat pictures or something.

“Oh, Canada!” or “The Star-Spangled Banner”? Because I think the former is much more danceable than the latter.

The latter was originally a drinking song. I bet Chumbawumba could make something danceable out of it.

As a GODLESS SECULAR HUMANIST I find it offensive to be equated with the Satanic Mythologists.

-Joe

Splitter!

(checks dictionary)

I’ll assume that’s a compliment.

-Joe

Those require pics, and that would actually be some evidence of CalD’s assertions. THAT would mean he/she would have to ignore they’re own evidence to support their position…My head hurts…

Sorry, one of those annoying Monty Python references. This one’s from Life of Brian:

Splitter!

He’s holding a contrary and argumentative position, but I don’t believe he’s trolling. A person can completely and utterly reject the scientific method (HE REJECTED THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH HIM) without being a troll. The thread continues because for some reason people still want to argue with somebody who isn’t actually reading their posts except to watch for keywords so he can make bizarre “gotcha!” comments.

If everybody just refused to engage him, he could go back to bitching about those slutty women who have sex before marriage.

And I really wish his name didn’t make me do a double-take and think people were talking about me every time I saw it out of the corner of my eye. :frowning:

If it’s any consolation, when I read his “sensical” OP, I at first thought it was you who posted it but halfway through the reading I stopped and thought, “This doesn’t sound like CaerieD at all!” Which made me double-check the username just to make sure.

GD is where it ended up though, and CalD was proven correct. CalD’s entire argument rests on the notion that a Creator just feels more right, which doesn’t fly in GD. Anyone arguing with CalD in that thread is wasting their breath.