Yikes! Are these woman intentionally dancing oddly or is the music being played (by “The Nice,” a forerunner of Emerson, Lake and Palmer) impossible to dance to?
I haven’t tested it yet, but almost any George Harrison song, especially his Beatles stuff. “Here Comes the Sun” is particularly awkward. Then, there’s this…
ETA: To be fair, he did play John & Yoko a nice waltz, once.
If just sitting doing nothing is considered dance, John Cage’s 4’33" can be danced to. Otherwise Gatopescado is right.
Except for Revolution 9, everybody can dance to that.
The music I’m hearing all has a pretty steady count of 4. I was expecting some weird time signature goofiness, but the bits and pieces I listened to were all in four – maybe later there’s some goofiness, but I got through about a minute of it and it’s really not my jam. As long as you can count to four, you should be able to dance to that, though the music itself is not conducive to dancing, in my opinion.
What’s fun is going to a Greek or Serbian or even some Indidan weddings where the beats don’t go in fours, and subdivisions of the beat are uneven (like in groups of 3s and 2s). To a Western ear, they are completely disorienting, as beats don’t land or change where you expect them to, but once you learn the patterns, you can count it out and dance to them. As long as there is regularity and predictability of form in the rhythm, then anything is danceable, I would say. I mean, heck, you can even say washes of white noise are danceable if you count free expression as dance.
This is what came to mind when I was thinking of a reply to this- music with odd time signatures, and not just odd in the sense of strange or unusual, odd in the sense of an odd number, like 7/4 time in the case of Peter Gabriel’s ‘Solsbury Hill’, or anything by the Dave Brubeck quartet.
And that kind of stuff is typical in Greek and Balkan music – it’s just a matter of getting used to it. Once you feel the “long” and “short” beats, it’s really not all that difficult to keep along.
Not quite as much in Hungary as further south. Hungarian folk tended to be in comfortable Western time signatures, but certainly not exclusively so. Once you get to Bulgaria, Greece, down to Turkey, things get a little more wild.
I mean, you CAN dance to it if you’ve heard the song a couple times and know what’s going on. 9/4 and 13/4 aren’t really all that goofy. The beginning is just an extra quarter note after two bars of 4/4, Technically, it’s really felt as 4/4 + 2/4 + 3/4, but for the purposes of dancing or swaying to the song, you can just count along to four and just remember to add a beat at the obvious place in the music it is at the end.
I’m not sure where’ there’s getting 13/4 in the verses. I can count straight 4 right through it. Is it the “I can show you I can show you all the people in my life part?” that’s in 4 up through “it’s driving me mad, just another way of passing the day” and then “I, I” part can still be danced in 4, but the beat is divided to 3+3+2.
It’s definitely danceable, though you can’t do a typical four-step dance to it. (Though you could get away with a four-step type dance through the whole song as long as you remember to add one extra beat in those spots at the end of the verses.)
I did just think of one where the time change totally suberts expectations: the very disco “Heart of Glass” by Blondie, where one half of the instrumental interlude takes out an eighth note, to make it bars of 7/8 instead of 4/4, after establishing a solid four-to-the-floor disco beat for most the song. And when that interlude repeats, it’s got the beat added back on, back to 4/4. If you know about that part, you can adjust, but it will typically throw most dancers off as they’re expecting a disco groove throughout.