I can well believe that when driving along inside your own car and encountering other drivers doing something stupid, you mutter some words about them that are worse than “jackass”. However, that has nothing to do with interpersonal modes of address, since they can’t hear you.
How is that relevant? Nobody is policing what you say about other people in the privacy of your own car. Nobody cares that you are sitting in your car muttering hateful words about another driver who can’t hear you.
The Boys are back in town, the Boys in the band, See What the Boys in the Back Room Will Have, The Boys, etc
When referred to as a group it is generally just a way of sounding friendly and informal. The girls in the secretary pool.
Referring to a single man by himself, “boy” is demeaning, same with “girl” unless the age calls for it.
But here,the context is odd, “mostly still girls” altho perhaps it is literal, they are young women 17-19 yo, still referred to as “girls”. (“Young women” would be better, tho)
But that sort of usage in a business context still comes across as, at best, somewhat patronizing and diminishing. It’s no accident that your “acceptable” example is “the girls in the secretary pool”, referring to a group of workers typically viewed as lower-status and subservient and almost invariably female, rather than, say, “the girls on the Board of Directors”.
The former usage simply does a better job of camouflaging the somewhat patronizing and diminishing nature of the term “girls”, because people are already used to female secretary-pool workers being referred to in a somewhat patronizing and diminishing way.
If a prestigious male US judge had referred to, say, Justices Sotomayor and Kagan and the late Justice Ginsburg as “the girls on the Supreme Court”, he wouldn’t have come across as sounding “friendly and informal”, no matter how friendly and informal he was trying to be. He’d have come across as sounding like a sexist asshole.
See my above response to octopus about the difference between the entertainment industry’s use of colloquialisms for the purpose of marketing entertainment products depicting fictional characters, and appropriate etiquette for modes of address for real-life people on the part of other real-life people.
There rarely are that many people on a BoD as in Secretarial pool. I have seen dozens. No longer, however, in fact secretarial pools are mostly a thing of the past. However, it is a standard term “the girls in the secretarial pool” , and ‘girls" wouldnt be applied much elsewhere, and my wife sez "the girls in my knitting circle’ even tho most have greying hair.
I say it is meant to sound friendly and informal, like “the boys in the band” even if some are female.
In addition to what Kimstu said, you say “The girls in the typing pool” - yet you wouldn’t say “the boys on the loading dock”, you’d say “the men on the loading dock”.
Truly what’s the big deal? My wife who is now 66 in non covid times would talk about meeting up with a couple of her “girlfriends” for coffee. I would talk about getting together with the boys for some beers over a football game.
I was once on a conference call at my state agency that had dozens of participants - none of whom were secretaries. Managers, regional directors, assistant commissioners and deputy commissioners. One of the white, male deputy commissioners referred to some of us as “girls”. A few days later, a different deputy commissioner happened to be in my office and the subject came up. He really didn’t understand why we were offended. The penny didn’t drop until we asked him how he would have reacted if that white, male deputy commissioner had referred to him as a “boy”.
if your wife wants to refer to the people in her knitting circle as “girls” that’s up to her and them. It doesn’t mean I can’t find it demeaning.
The number of people in a particular workplace/professional category has no bearing on whether it’s disrespectful or inappropriate to refer to the adult female individuals among them as “girls”.
Nobody is disagreeing that that particular term is to some extent “standard” or conventional as a traditional way of referring to adult female secretary-pool workers. The point is that it is a sexist, patronizing and diminishing holdover from the days when it was widely viewed as entirely normal to refer to adult female secretary-pool workers in sexist, patronizing and diminishing ways.
If anybody these days is still referring to any adult female secretary-pool workers as “the girls in the secretarial pool”, they should stop doing that. Unless they know the women in question are personally okay with it and the term isn’t being used in contexts where it might be seen as disparaging those women’s claims to adult dignity and respect as co-workers.
It is none of our business how your wife and the other women in her knitting circle consensually refer to one another in their informal social context, nor what color their hair is.
Nobody is disagreeing with you that people who say “the girls in the secretarial pool” (mostly, probably) mean it to sound friendly and informal rather than patronizing and sexist.
We’re just pointing out that it comes across as sounding patronizing and sexist, despite (probably, mostly) not having been intended to sound that way.