Is This Ironic?

…well is it? Pope Tells Clergy in Angola to Work Against Belief in Witchcraft

He can not defeat the Charmed Ones :smiley:

It’s not particularly ironic that the pope is opposed to a belief in witchcraft. It might be ironic if a witch doctor was opposed to a belief in witchcraft, maybe.

No, the Pope is not an iron.

I suppose it is, if you frame it as the church discouraging superstition and then (at least at first glance) perpetuating myths about condoms making the AIDS problem worse.

Or you could frame it as the pope, the leader of the world’s largest religious organization, discouraging supernatural belief. Then again, he’s likely just trying to get animists to convert to his brand of faith, not to eschew faith altogether.

i’s not ironic at all; he’s not denying the existence of such things, he is stating that Christians have no reason to fear such things. He argues that by blending traditional beliefs (the article specifically mentioned animism) with Christianity, people subject themselves to unnecessary fear, and others to unjust violence.

. Yep, one unnecessary fear is probably enough.

I found it funny: when I was studying at Georgetown, I remember seeing a group of clergy in full regalia, carrying scepters and God knows what, on their way to doing something like blessing the main gate (not sure exactly what they were doing). I was struck by an overwhelming embarrassment for them, and a feeling that they were like shamans, only with more expensive clothes.

They are exactly like shamans with more expensive clothes. It would be just as easy (and make as much sense) for witch doctors to warn against Catholicism.

Only if you’re Alanis Morissette.
But considering the following:

I don’t think telling people they have no reason to fear to witchcraft-(when you consider they fear it so much they’re torturing small children and the elderly) is “ironic”:

It’s about as ironic as rain on your wedding day.

edit: dang you Guinastasia

But is not the history of the Catholic Church fraught with association with similar atrocities?

Paving the road with good intentions doesn’t in my view solve the basic problems created by the similar dogmas.

I can already see the articles/interviews/etc… being written in The Onion.

I think at some point the church was practically paving roads with good intestines, with all the drawing and quartering of heretics. Or am I confusing my tortures and torturers?

My gut feeling says… ummm…no.

I recall an essay on the song’s theme, focusing on just what would really count as irony.

You could easily tweak the “rain on your wedding day” bit so that it would qualify. All that would be required is for the groom to be a meteorologist and to have helped set the wedding date based on his calculated prediction, with the agreement and full knowledge of the bride of his reason for recommendation. :smiley:

This works especially well if the wedding is set for a date no more than two weeks ahead. The closer the date set, the better, obviously. (Now, I realize that when people think of a wedding, they usually think of a heavily catered event that has to be planned and engineered over several months to a couple of years. But there are still “quickie” marriages, so the scenario is not really ridiculous.)


The above thought, with my additions, may seem a bit sexist. Someone else had come up with it, though. I say, the bride could have been a meteorologist instead.

Or they could both be same, and let’s say that they worked together on it.

Now, that would really be ironic!

-don’t you think?

  • “Jack”

The HEADLINE is certainly ironic. It’s a famed advocate of the supernatural advocating against belief in the supernatural.

The underlying story is more complex and so isn’t ironic, but the headline, as presented, is.

He’s not advocating against belief in the supernatural. He’s advocating against belief in one specific supernatural thing that he and his organization have opposed for a long time.

Read again for comprehension.

And so, they are not allowed to ever, EVER speak out against attrocities in THIS day and age? Ever?

:rolleyes:

That’s like saying that the US was built on slave labor, so we can’t protest slavery anywhere else in the world.

God, you’re thick.