Oh, forget it.
I do Employer’s side employment law in Oakland, CA. In CA, the money is really in doing plaintiff’s work. Those guys work on contingency but they make a lot more money if you work it out to a hourly basis. Also, all the business owner complain how the labor law here really favors employees a lot.
With the level of disrespect you show for the people you interact with here, do you really think you deserve politeness?
No, you’re right I’ve been a jerk and no excuses, I knew better. But believe it or not, if I didn’t think I was learning new stuff, I wouldn’t be coming back. I get enough abuse from my nephew who thinks I’m just part of the Establishment. I don’t need more from you guys…a joke or two here and there that would be nice.
There is a huge difference between sarcastic advice and flat out bad advice - there is plenty of snark here on the SDMB - but by and large, as you well should note by now - we call out the bad and will not let it stand when ever possible.
Thats why there are different forums on this board with rules related to the type - there is a place for snark - there is never a place for ‘bad advice’.
Had you not started with “I’m a lawyer and I read…” - your bad advice would have been challenged anyway - but you would not (likely) be in this particular pit thread.
It’s a good thing you have a corp job, probably taking advantage of the same ‘employee favored rules’ to keep yourself employed that your employer has you fight so you can get rid of others… mighty fine christian of ya.
Basically - if you want to be a ‘respected’ member here, then you should contribute to the idea that is in the masthead - “Fighting Ignorance” - all you have done so far is prove that you are ignorant or just don’t care about the quality of your words in a public forum - neither are things that last long here.
You ARE the joke.
Actually, you have been one of the nicer guys to me. So I deserve it.
A man sees a boy with a box of kittens the man goes over and says “oh what cute kittens!” the boy replies “yes they are Christian kittens”.
About a week later the man sees the boy again with the same batch of kittens. once again he walks over and says “my, those are just adorable!” the boy replies “yes, they are atheist kittens” the man asks “wait, weren’t they christian before?” the boy looks at the man and says " yeah but they have their eyes open now"
Oh no. I believe martyrdom is always the first step in the death-spiral.
Hmmm. Exactly the opposite of the situation in Illinois.
I’d like to learn something about your time management skills, though. It amazes me that a working lawyer would be able ot manage so much time on a message board.
Also, bragging about not charging your clients for the time you spend on the board is, er, rather startling.
Hmmm. Exactly the opposite of Illinois.
I’d really like to know about your time management technique. It amazes me that a working attorney can find so much time to post on message boards.
And bragging about not billing your clients for time spent on the board is, er, rather startling. That’s like bragging about not being a shoplifter.
(edited because I pulled down the wrong quote)
It wasn’t such a big deal in the past, but in the last 5 years or so here in CA. Attorneys in the big firms in the big cities: LA, SF, and SJ have been accused of padding their bills. It’s gotten so bad that the bills are now being monitored by the In-House corporate counsels.
However, it all comes out in the wash. If a corporation has their In-House counsel reviewing the bills they still need to pay their counsel to do it. So the corporation really doesn’t save that much money.
Buh-bye Simpleton Linctus!
It’s typically the same law firms doing both for us, our counter-party in civil court is typically one or another government agency.
Business owners everywhere say that.
Admin law is a whole different kettle of fish.
Chapter 28
…I arrived home in my rational car after a long day lawyering. It would be another three days until it was time to discover what riveting things my pastor would have in store for me this Sunday, so I decided to use the toilet.
…After my bowels were rationally voided, I figured I could spare some time on the Internet machine, and share the revelations God had instilled in me about how boring and pathetic atheists lives are, and how useless scienceism is — but not in a self-righteous way and maintaining a rationalistic air — irregardless of the fact I’m practically bathing in all the fruit science has reaped over its senseless reign over religion. Yes, God assured me this was the right thing to do; for I felt a tingle.
…But first, it was time to feed the cat.
Sorry, Bulwer-Lytton entries must be a single sentence only. Try replacing the periods with semicolons and you’ve got something.
Thank you. This caps off a very entertaining thread.
Its not a big accomplishment but I do like pchaos better than JOSH. But she’s probably a better lawyer
cmyk’s post is brilliant. This one, less so.
“The good thing about science is that it’s true whether or not you believe in it.”