I asked my wife last night, and she says that Sefardic Jews do not make an aufruf. So that would suggest that the custom is of (relatively) recent origin.
While I’m at it, I would like to comment on the folowing:
Are you some sort of Halachic authority? If not, what is the point of expressing your “opinion” on such matters?
In German, the verb rufen is to call. auf is a preposition having slightly different meanings based on context, but I don’t think it’s generally up…more on or onto or to. So call to, perhaps…anyway, German is not my native language, so feel free to elucidate further, anyone.
Personally, I don’t get it. I see “god” as a title, not a name. The Christian god’s name is Yaweh, Jehovah, etc. Not “God”. Calling god “God” is like calling the queen “Your Majesty” or referring to your mom’s sister as “Auntie”… it isn’t a NAME it’s a TITLE. Just like “Lord” is a title. I accept your right to write it “g-d” but you’ll have to accept my right to think it’s silly.
I am of the belief that the less you hear of God’s name, and the glory related to the name, the more likely that the common term devil and the name Satan becomes a factor in one’s life. So making the name Jehovah taboo can be counterproductive in terms of spiritual growth. He said not to use his name in vain, or as part of a profane swear; there is nowhere in the Torah or the Bible that I can see where He advocates not saying his name at all.
This taboo gets a little ridiculous in regards to censoring on TV. When one says “Goddamn” on an edited TV show, the “God” part is silenced, leaving the “damn” audible. Anybody want to comment on this.
Maybe it is just my mind after a few beers, but why remove the vowel. Why G_D. Why not G^D, or GO@. Why not just use a nickname like “higher authority.”
There is some precedence and history for doing this and if I look through the SDMB archives I may find answers.
The important part of the aufruf, from whence the term arises, is the groom’s being “called up” or “called to” the Torah to read part of the daily Torah portion on the Shabbat prior to his wedding. It is basically synonymous with the the Hebrew term aliyah, which is used more generally to refer to being called to the Torah to read during services (aliyah is also used in a slightly more figurative sense to mean emigrating to Israel). Having an aliyah is considered an privilege, and is typically accorded to persons in the congregation who have some special event to celebrate or who are being honored for some reason, hence the custom of calling the groom to the bimah in this way just before his wedding.
Credentials: passed my grad school reading proficiency exam in German, converted to Judaism after years of study four years ago, and had an aufruf in my wife’s home shul the day before my own wedding.
weirddave, why is that so? “The nations shall know that I am Jehovah” is kind of straightforward utterance about his intention to make his word known throughout the earth.
Like it or not, the development of the modern English language is closely tied to Christianity. Addressing the Christian deity as “God” is just good English, regardless of whether or not you have issues with the religion itself. And besides, that’s the name that He told us to use.
And as far as the OP goes - I always thought that the use of G-D was just an nice abbreviation for saying god-damn. Maybe I’m missing the reference.
Why the hell would anyone waste their time worshipping a god who would care about how his name was spelled? Or, whether you wore a stupid skull cap, or any other type of foolishness?
Well, it’s a talent that I have nurtured for quite a while now and I thought I was in the BBQ pit and didn’t think I had to make nice to make my point. If I was posting to a more general news group I might have been kinder.
That doesn’t change the fact that I think that any god worth his salt wouldn’t make his worshippers look and act like goofs to all the rest of the world. It kinda cuts down on conversions. Think of it, 11th commandment, “Thou shalt wear funny looking headgear”. It seems to me that if you all developed a secret hand shake you would get the same results, not piss off the neighbors, and still be comfortable in the summer.
I have a picture in my head of some long dead priest sitting up in heaven elbowing god in the ribs laughing, “Look! Look, they are still wearing that stupid hat down there that I wore one day as a joke to amuse my kids! Hah, hah, hah!”. God then snorts coffee out his nose.
;j
If you were merely interested to know what possible rationale there could be in an omnipotent deity wanting you to do anything, that is certainly a very legitimate question. But if you have made up your mind concerning things that you know nothing about that they are silly and foolish, than there’s nothing to discuss.
This may be the point already made by the previous two posters, but I thought I’d clarify.
OK, Uzi, when you frame it that way (that is, not deliberately offensive to all sects in general and to Jews in particular), I understand your point. I just don’t see how a god’s being omnipotent automatically means that it wouldn’t ask certain behavior from its worshippers.
There are all sorts of groups who wear different types of hats and other assorted paraphenalia. I actually didn’t have jews in mind when I was posting. I was thinking turbans, actually. But in either case it’s the same.
I agree god could tell you to jump off bridges, or drink purple cool-aid, too. People do all sorts of things to prove their beliefs. Which is why I mentioned the secret handshake thing. People are proving to other humans in that particular group that they have the same beliefs and attitudes as they do. Like any other club. It’s one of the reasons for uniforms in the army, so that you can tell people of one group from another.
More importantly, did god tell you to act in a certain way, or did someone in the past say that to prove your faith you should act this way? Knowing a little bit about human nature, it seems to me that if I was starting a religion I would state the rules that god set down (kinda nice of him to talk to me and not you, huh) and one of those rules would be to that you need to follow god’s messenger on earth (me) to get any updates. For example: The Pope. Does he talk to god to get the scoop, or does he make it up himself? He reads the same bible as you do, so what insight does he have that you do not? If he states that you have to do something not specified in the bible where is he getting that information from? If god is omnipotent as many claim he is why couldn’t you be placed on the same mailing list as the pope is?
As you are not on that mailing list you have to rely on what is written down (holy texts) and what your preacher tells you to do. This is what faith is all about. Relying on the word of others as to the way things are. With all the different religions, each one claiming to have the one and only truth, is seems that god doesn’t care which group you belong to. If he did he would clear the situation up once and for all and we would all be wearing turbans, or whatever else. So, the question remains. Why would god want you to do a certain thing when he won’t expend the effort to make sure that everyone was on the same page doing the exact same thing?
As I’ve stated before. All this could be cleared up so easily, those of you who talk to god and get answers (cookoo!) ask him to give me a call. In otherwords, all I want is the Straight Dope. I won’t hold my breath.
(Ugh, I shut up now!)