[QUOTE=Acid Lamp]
Yes, but not as much as this situation. Considering that there are so many children that need adoption, I’d view that as a completely selfish action, and a rather improper use of technology.
[/QUOTE]
Well, that’s some crazy-ass bullshit right there. Having your own kids is selfish, now? Do you selfishly have a bank account, while there are people out there with nothing? Do you own property while there are people in refugee camps? Are you wearing clothes, while somebody somewhere is freezing?
I’m sorry, but a sub-minority group of people with a sexual confusion issue that borders on schizophrenia aren’t allowed to just re-write the laws of nature, and people aren’t bigots or assholes for feeling totally fucking creeped out by the entire situation, political correctness be damned. This is gross and horrible on many levels, and these people are mentally ill.
[QUOTE=Bryan Ekers]
Well, that’s some crazy-ass bullshit right there. Having your own kids is selfish, now? Do you selfishly have a bank account, while there are people out there with nothing? Do you own property while there are people in refugee camps? Are you wearing clothes, while somebody somewhere is freezing?
Selfish git.
[/QUOTE]
As an adopted child of an unwanted pregnancy, your damn right it is. People who spend tens of thousands of dollars merely to produce a sprog of their own genetic material while passing over the opportunity to give a child a loving home and raise children are selfish pricks IMHO. If you are incapable of having children, then adoption ought to be your first option. If you can’t get approved for adoption, perhaps you ought to reconsider having kids. Frankly, the gender bending the “father” is demonstrating would be enough for me to triple check “his” mental state before clearing the couple to adopt.
[QUOTE=Acid Lamp]
If you can’t get approved for adoption, perhaps you ought to reconsider having kids. Frankly, the gender bending the “father” is demonstrating would be enough for me to triple check “his” mental state before clearing the couple to adopt.
[/QUOTE]
So they should adopt, but the fact they’d give this alternative serious consideration is evidence they shouldn’t adopt?
Well, don’t we have such a special little exclusive club?
I agree! This issue made me so mad I immediately ran to my stove, put all four elements on “high” and pressed both palms and both nipples down until the searing of my own flesh made my eyes water up enough that I no longer had to look upon the horror… the horror… That didn’t last, though, so I followed up by smashing the oven door closed repeatedly on my fingers until the cracking of my bones drowned out the sound of my own chest-wracking sobs at the monstrous… uh… monstrosity that has clearly pushed aside humanity and allowed such a thing to occur.
[QUOTE=Bryan Ekers]
So they should adopt, but the fact they’d give this alternative serious consideration is evidence they shouldn’t adopt?
Well, don’t we have such a special little exclusive club?
[/QUOTE]
Yeah it’s tiny, made up of I dunno, what? the other 99% of the world? Transgender people represent a TINY fraction of any population, and yes, those who decide to bounce back and forth like a bloody table tennis ball just MIGHT be a little unstable upstairs.
[QUOTE=Bryan Ekers]
So anything not done by 99% of the population is a mark of instability?
[/QUOTE]
I don’t watch big brother, does that make me unstable?
This thread just makes me sad. They shouldn’t have their own children, that’s selfish and wrong when there’s so many unhomed kiddies out there. But they shouldn’t be allowed to adopt, because they’re sick in the head and FREAKS! They should be happy with a pet dog?
Not because of moral issues or “eww! pregnant man” or any of that stuff, but because I can’t believe that hormone therapy for gender reassignment won’t interfere with the normal development of the kid.
[QUOTE=Really Not All That Bright]
Not because of moral issues or “eww! pregnant man” or any of that stuff, but because I can’t believe that hormone therapy for gender reassignment won’t interfere with the normal development of the kid.
[/QUOTE]
I was wondering about the hormones, but it seems she stopped using it. From the article linked upthread.
Normally I pride myself on being open-minded about gender stuff, really I do. I understand homosexual, transsexual, and neuter; as far as a straight male can I suppose.
This squicks me out. I don’t know why, but it is just WRONG to me. I don’t bear these people any ill-will but I can’t muster up any sympathy for their “plight” with the fertility doctors who refused to help them.
[/QUOTE]
That’s where you’re wrong. I’m a straight male, yet I’m also not a judgmental asshole. YMMV, and apparently does.
[QUOTE=Q.E.D.]
…kinda reads to me like you’re suggesting he doesn’t have a right to talk about it all he wants.
[/QUOTE]
Which kinda indicates to me that you have some reading comprehension issues. Now, if I had said, for instance, “stop talking about it” or “shut the hell up” of any other string of words in the English language that could reasonably be interpreted as saying he doesn’t have the right to talk aout it, then you might possibly have nad some sort of point. As it is, no. Sorry.
There is no sexual confusion here. He’s a man, she’s a woman, they’re a happily married couple and they are taking advantage of a unique situation to have a child.
And you got your degree that allows you to diagnose this man as borderline schizophrenic is from what institution of higher learning?
What “laws of nature” are being re-written here exactly?
Yeah, actually they are bigots and assholes, because they’re shutting off their rational mind and clinging to fear and loathing.
[QUOTE=Otto]
Which kinda indicates to me that you have some reading comprehension issues.
[/QUOTE]
If you say so, Sport. But telling someone something is “not any of their concern” and that they should “get over it” doesn’t exactly strike me as an invitation to continue the discussion. You can claim you meant whatever you want, but your actual words tend to belie you.
[QUOTE=Acid Lamp]
Normally I pride myself on being open-minded about gender stuff, really I do. I understand homosexual, transsexual, and neuter; as far as a straight male can I suppose.
[/QUOTE]
Wait, wait, wait… Neuter?! :eek: In a context that doesn’t involve pets? Jesus Christ! People are actually doing that to themselves? That’s not supposed to be seen as acceptable behavior, is it?
[QUOTE=neutron star]
Wait, wait, wait… Neuter?! :eek: In a context that doesn’t involve pets? Jesus Christ! People are actually doing that to themselves? That’s not supposed to be seen as acceptable behavior, is it?
[/QUOTE]
Uh, I don’t know if this is a whoosh, but if not, the way I see it, anything that the human imagination can come up with has been done at some point*. And probably more than once.
Also, my general rule is, if it doesn’t impinge on anyone else’s rights, whatever floats your boat. Life is hard enough without other people trying to have a say in something that you can’t change about yourself, doesn’t hurt anyone else, and really isn’t anyone else’s business.
(PS. If you really want to be freaked out, look up castrati.)
*Excluding things like witchcraft and superpowers, and such. Though we’re pretty crafty creatures. Given enough time, who knows?
[QUOTE=neutron star]
Wait, wait, wait… Neuter?! :eek: In a context that doesn’t involve pets? Jesus Christ! People are actually doing that to themselves? That’s not supposed to be seen as acceptable behavior, is it?
[/QUOTE]
Even as a professional LGBT advocate, I tend to get the terminology for the various different types of gender expression mixed up a little, but I’m pretty sure “neuter” means expressing no gender at all, not actually removing one’s genitalia.