Huerta88 has shown proof, you haven’t.
Heh.
Well, there is this one:
No, he’s made allegations.
This is now the third-longest Pit thread in SDMB history, and the longest Pit thread devoted to a single topic.
The two longer threads are both omnibus, compilation-type threads: The Stupid Republican idea of the day thread, and the Workplace griping, anyone? thread.
Nonsense. He’s backed up his statements with cites, logic, and good reasoning. You’ve backed up your statements with imagination, wishes, and pornography.
Well, thank you, Mr. Sunshine!
No, you’re wrong even here. It’s the board’s liberal postership who, in understandable pique over the fact that so many do regard the fifties as the time when America was at its zenith, have insisted on hanging the tag on me. My own personal belief as to when America was at its zenith is pretty much the entire twentieth century prior to 1968 or 1969.
But again I digress. Looks like it’s time for the promised busting of Huerta’s chops, the legitimacy of which will have little import to most the thread’s posters (F-G and a few other reasonable posters excluded).
Huerta was blessedly absent from the thread for a couple of days recently and then returned with his usual flurry of hysterical nonsense, and I will begin there. However, as I’ve said I’m on my iPod, which is cumbersome, awkward and time-consuming, requiring one-finger-at-a-time typing and thirteen keystrokes merely to type "
[/quote]
".
Therefore I will proceed at my own pace, perhaps taking days to complete the task, and breaking off to engage other posts and/or posters as I see fit. And now, off to address the first…
It’s getting harder and harder to take you seriously.
And you have refutations you can “point out” to disprove that;
–you pretended I had claimed to be able to definitively prove the fact that you posted the Pennlive bullshit? You lied.
–you claimed there was no basis for deeming naked man boy touching in a shower, after I’d posted the indecent exposure statute?
–you claimed that the lights were out in the locker room when McQueary entered the locker room?
Should be easy to find such proof that my allegations were unfounded, right, littlle bitch (you moron, you dd know everyone can read your prior posts? Of course you do, you’re counting on the sheer volume of your diarrhea to discourage anyone from fact-checking)?
Unfortunately for you, bitch, I’m here to check your shit. And I’m not going away, bitch. Your meager intellectual attainments make this all too easy to dash off, and the not-so-minor point, you’re an evil retarded pervert who needs to be beaten down as often as possible (there’s an honorable alternative, but like Sandusky, and unlike Rommel, youre too much the woman to try and redeem your miserable disgusting existence with the first manly act of your life).
At the risk of self-attaboy (which you’ve been doing like a crack whore sucking dick, an apt comparison) – an angel just earned its wings, Zuzu.
We’ll make it easy on you, just find one single one and post it.
If you can even do that we will be stunned into silence.
Huerta: “OK, go ahead”
[QUOTE=Starving Artist]
I never said I’d post refutation of your lies. I merely said I’d point them out…
[/QUOTE]
Starving Artist: "But but but that’s because I’m constrained to having to post with only mi iPod touch right now, and cutting, pasting and searching are far too difficult and time consuming…Therefore I’ve proven that your posts are full of lies, misrepresentations, and misconceptions. Once again, I’ve shown solid proof that I’m right :D:D:D
Little wonder that this thread is never-ending. I for one can’t get enough of SA’s retarded logic. Comedy fucking GOLD :D:D:D
I stopped taking you seriously years ago. You’ve, in all that time, posted exactly once on point to me, and that was my Foghorn Leghorn impersonation.
LMAO. But one minor correction: Starving Artist has backed up his statements with imagination, wishes, and CHILD pornography.
Mini-unauthoruzed poll: “Agree or disagree, Huerta is a dirty hate-America-first liberal poster who does not stand up for the true American consevative values of man boy shower lessons.”
Moron.
Foreign and liberal posters, please take it that this fuckwit’s revolting positions and moronic arguments are not typical or representative of America, what is great about America, social conservatism, or anything else this little bitch claims to be a spokegirl for. Please.
We really are better (Americans, conservatives) than this moron represents us.
People whose brains are destined to end up in a jar in an institute for the psychosexually deranged are not a fair basis for judging an entire country or political movement.
Belgium has great chocolate, moules, and beer. I don’t judge them because of their recent crop of pedos.
Please don’t judge us for this cretin.
That’s because there’s been more hysteria and willful ignorance and utter disregard for the principals of evidence, due process, truth and justice than in any other Pit thread in SDMB history, with a healthy helping of unthinking lynch mob mentality thrown in for good measure. Prior to this thread I was amazed that Nancy Grace was able to draw enough viewers to stay on the air; now I wouldn’t be surprised if she doesn’t wind up richet than Oprah. I had no idea that there were so many hysterical crackpots in the world and this thread has given me a whole new appreciation of our system of justice…and of what a defense attorney’s life must be like.
Actually, wasn’t Nixon elected in 1968? Hmmmm…
You know what? Take your patronizing attitude and shove it straight up your ass. I don’t “believe the worst about you”. I only judge on what I see. And when I see someone who dismisses child abuse the way you have here, it disgusts me.
I don’t need you to “feel sorry for me”, or “go easy on me”. Be as mean to me as you want, I’m not some fragile little waif. Go to hell.
Would you classify this position:
The report was serious enough it merited investigation by authorities
as
“hysteria and willful ignorance and utter disregard for the principals of evidence, due process, truth”
Little Bitch,
I will make you a deal, you show me yours and I’ll show you mine (an offer that must be irresistable to a Sandusky buttboy):
You describe the nature and extent of your formal training in the “principles of evidence” and then I’ll describe mine bitch.
Go on, it’s one more clear facial challenge for your bitch (by this I mean a superficially-male person who has submitted to deviate sexual intercourse, as for instance in jail – were you in jail?) Predeliction to ignore or evade.
I’m beginning to wonder if SA put me on ignore, oh the irony.