It's time to officially Pit Joe Paterno and the Penn State football program.

You know what, quit posting shit like this. If you’re ready to go out the door, or do something, just don’t post. It’s annoying as all get out. Either post when you have time, or shut the fuck up. This isn’t a chat room.

Gotta fuck. BRB

Tell ya what, Guin, you quit posting lies about what I’ve said or think or believe, and get childish posters like Huerta to stop accusing me of running away when I don’t answer in what they deem to be an adequate amount of time, and in return I’ll stop making what ought to be my utterly benign stepping-away-from-the-thread posts.

Otherwise, and given the way you lie about me and insult me and attempt to order me around I can’t imagine why you think I’d do anything you ask (or more accurately - demand! It is to laugh).

Lies? Last time I checked, I directly quoted you. Unless you’re accusing yourself of lying.

It annoys you because it is obviously Starving Pederast’s little euphemism for “I have to go rape a little boy!”.

“I have to go Christmas Shopping”, “I have to go cook chicken and dumplings”,“I’m running down to the 711 to get some chocolate covered cherries”, " Dinner’s ready!"

We ALL know what he really means. What a sick motherfucker.

Nope, let me refresh your memory (with my proper responses included):

Nope, I’m not like that and I’ve said absolutely nothing to make a rational person make such a claim, so…

Winning!

Nope, not little and not a pussy. I’ll grant YMMV on the “son of a bitch” part. So…

Winning!
Winning!

No doubt about it. SA is so obviously a child rapist that I frankly cannot believe he hasn’t been banned from this site. All his fantasies about ‘naked bear hugs with little boys, giving them lessons in showering, nude wrestling, playing hide the soap games, etc’ are fucking nauseating. With him on board, it’s hard to differentiate the SDMB from the NAMBLA forum.

Clearly “Winning” is yet another one of his little code words meaning “I’m a child rapist”.

Winning!

Winning

Reported.

“Don’t worry, if Father Dave tries anything you don’t like, just remain standing and face away from him and you’ll be perfectly fine.”

Hmmm dinner must be getting cold! Either that or he’s bound and gagged.

Nope, not fantasies. Merely alternative possibilities to explain what was almost certainly not anal rape.

Winning!

(Boy, you guys are really keeping me busy. The lies are flyimg like snowflakes in a blizzard. I’m gonna have to write a macro. :D)

Winning!

Reminder:

Restricted language in the Pit


Please keep this in mind.

Gfactor
Pit Mode

Thread synopsis:

SA: You know, there is not a shred of evidence to prove your allegations that Joe Paterno sought to cover up McQueary’s report, or that he knew of and/or enabled Sandusky’s raping of children, or that he allowed it in order to protect the university. Also, a closer look at the facts makes it highly unlikely that what McQueary saw was actually anal rape.

Anti-Paterno crowd: Liar! Dumbass! Pedophile/pedophile enabler! Sicko. Conservative! Old guy!

:: high fives all around :: “Boy, we really proved that asshole was full of shit, didn’t we!?”

SA: :rolleyes:

Gfactor, why hasn’t Starving Artist gotten warned for all those graphic descriptions of child rape here? Or is that completely kosher now?

[Quote]
(http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=14735230&postcount=194):

If you told something like that to a child, do you think they would feel comfortable telling you they were molested? Think about it. IF they were actually, truly molested, do you think they would feel they could trust you, if they heard you say that?

Because they aren’t graphic descriptions of child rape, you hysterical moron. They’re graphic descriptions of why it most likely couldn’t have been child anal rape.

Who said anything about saying that to a child? I thought we were having a discussion among [quasi] adults here.

So how would you react if your child came to you and told you he/she had been molested?

I’d want the crime determined, proper charges brought, and the bad guy tried, convicted and jailed.

Now having said that, why do you keep asking this and what the hell difference does it make. Is it your belief that if my child were molested the proper response would be to make up the worst thing I could and accuse him of that…and that this response is understandable, expected and justified?

You’re a loon, Guin. If you ever get called up for jury duty I hope you’ll have enough integrity to show the judge this thread and point out to him which posts are yours. You’ll have a Get Out Of Jury Duty Free card for sure.