SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP!!! JUST SHUT THE FUCK UP ALREADY, YOU FUCKING SICK BASTARD! QUIT DEFENDING A PEDOPHILE! EVERYONE HERE THINKS YOU’RE A FUCKING JACKASS, AND YOUR CREDIBILITY HAS BEEN SHOT ALL TO HELL ON THIS BOARD. YOU’VE PRETTY MUCH DESTROYED ANY LITTLE BIT OF RESPECT ANYONE HAD FOR YOU? ARE YOU HAPPY, YOU SUCK FUCK?
fixing caps
Guinnypoo, dear, please!
Calm down and see if you can somehow gain control of your senses, such as they may be.
The only person I’ve defended is Joe Paterno.
With regard to the pedophile, all I’ve defended is due process.
You people were quick to jump to the conclusion that McQueary happened upon anal rape in the shower that night, and you used that conclusion to heap villification upon villification onto Joe Paterno, claiming he knew all about it, how long it had been going on, and had intentionally allowed it to continue for the next ten years.
Trouble is, the whole thing was built on a house of cards and there wasn’t a word of truth to any of it…not even the rape!
So for whatever Sandusky really did do, and can be proven in a court of law, fine, throw the book at him. I’m behind that 100%. But don’t expect me to jump on board the crazy train and act for all the world that he’s guilty of a crime he didn’t commit just because he’s a bad guy and you want to pretend Joe Paterno knew about it and covered up for it.
If that costs me respect on this board, it’s a sacrifice I’ll happily make.
I am NOT your “dear”.
Mission accomplished.
You do know that Sandusky was already tried and convicted, right? The book was thrown at him. You seem to be talking as if he has not been tried yet. He was. He is guilty.
Wouldn’t it be really fucking strange if this is the one kid Sandusky showered with and didn;t rape? And McQueary reported it as a “sexual act” to Joe “Shitface” Paterno, but lied about what he saw. But it turned out that Sandusky was actually a rapist! Wow! What are the chances of accusing a guy of being a rapist for the Hell of it, and having him turn out to actually be a rapist!
Maybe I should ask McQueary what numbers he thinks will win the Powerball this week.
No. You claimed that the act Sandusky was being accused of was not physically possible. In so doing, you were not just arguing in defense of Paterno’s actions, but Sandusky’s as well.
I’ve noticed you never address the points I make. You just yell and screech about what a sick bastard I am and you implore me over and over to shut up, but you never point to anything I’m wrong about.
Why is that, hmmmmmmmm?
Oh, please. :rolleyes:
No, I was arguing that in that particular case the evidence did not support a conclusion of anal rape. How many times do I have to say that? It’s a legal matter. To the extent that it’s a defense of a pedophile, it’s a defense that’s proper because he wasn’t raping that child.
He isn’t guilty of raping the boy in the shower. And yes, the book has been thrown at him otherwise. I find that fact just peachy.
You just said the only person you’ve defended is Joe Paterno. Are you now admitting that you did defend Sandusky, but properly so?
No, I said I was arguing in regard to a point of law, and that if in doing so a defense of Sandusky were to be the result, it would be as a by-product of arguing that point of law.
You really should give up these little attempts at entrapment. You’re not very good at it.
ETA: Are you trying to imply that accused pedophiles should be denied a legal defense?
You said, repeatedly, that it was impossible for Sandusky to have performed the act he was accused of. I don’t see how that’s “in regard to a point of law.” You were not arguing about some technicality. This wasn’t about the elements that would need to be proven by the prosecution in court, or whether the charge could be sustained without a complaining witness, or anything like that. You said that he could not, and therefore did not, commit the act. That is not a point of law, that is a defense of Sandusky’s actions.
No. I’m stating outright that when you say the only person you have defended is Paterno, you are wrong.
Dude. You have no respect left on this board to sacrifice. You are an embarrassing laughingstock. When your name pops up in threads, everyone immediately thinks, “Oh god, it’s the paper towel tube fucking guy.” There is no way for you to salvage this situation. No amount of “humorous” comebacks or arguing or even participation in other, non-pedophilia-related threads is going to fix this for you. Maybe if you took a year-long vacation from the boards and then changed your user name. Maybe. But probably not even then.
If you want to take the position that I was coincidentally defending Sandusky on a crime he didn’t commit, I would be okay with that. Were I a lawyer I’d do the same. However my main objective was to show that according to McQueary’s testimony a conclusion of anal rape could not logically be drawn.
So, you’ve achieved some sorta Vulcan mind meld with the dude?
Dudette, give me a break! I couldn’t care less what you or any of your cohort in this thread think of me! Is that not obvious by now? I am right, you are wrong. I have been right all through this thread and you have been wrong all through this thread. And you are not only wrong but your position is reprehensible by every concept of justice and decency that people in this country are supposed to hold dear. Why should I care about respect from people like you? People like you make me wish I’d gone with my first impulse and suggested a toilet paper tube!
As for my postings on the rest of the board, I have been doing and will do just fine, thank you very much.
So it’s reprehensible that we say it was not “impossible”?
Given that none of us were there that would seem to be the rational position.
No dipshit, you are reprehensible. Sick fucks like you are whats wrong with the world. All you are concerned with is that the victim was too afraid to come forward before the trial, so you claim the jury holds your fucked up belief that it is physically impossible for a grown man to rape a child.
That isn’t what they said ass-hat, they said that they can’t prove he raped this kid, but that he did rape the 10 others.
God I feel sorry for the kids you say you have. I hope they don;t turn out to have the same fucked up way of thinking that you have. If Charles Manson could read the things you say, he’d probably be sitting in his cell saying to himself, “Shit, this guy is fucked up.”
Last night I saw upon the stair
A little man who wasn’t there
He wasn’t there again today
Oh, how I wish he’d go away