And you should. Who taught you to leave yourself wide open like that? Not your football coach, I hope. Unless you were a receiver.
Of the football, you perverts.
Every time this thread gets bumped I feel a glowing, growing warmth in my paper towel tubes.
Could a moderator retitle the thread to "It was time two years ago to officially Pit Joe Paterno and the Penn State football program. Drop it already."
winning!
You have a point on this one. Your performance in this thread is far better characterized by the phrase ‘Utter Stupidity and Cluelessness’.
See what I mean? 
LOL- you actually said that. I’m glad that you now see the light and understand that the physical position described is certainly and obviously physically possible.
Just like Charlie Sheen 
To be fair, someone did have to lie about what he said. It just happened to be him. So he’s winning against himself.
Can somebody just put a stake through the heart of this damn thread?
Can somebody lock this thread into the heart of a wicker man made of paper towel tubes and set it ablaze?
I think we leave this thread open as a monument to what can be achieved.
“Remember when Starving Artist went full retard?”
“Ya, you never go full retard”
This reminds me that I do need some more paper towels.
Dottie Sandusky was on GMA today, talking to Matt Lauer. She still claims that Sandusky is innocent although she did blink a bit when Matt asked her what she would think if one of her children told her that a naked man hugged him in the shower at school. She showed Matt the bedroom in the basement where one of the alleged assaults took place. Matt pointed out that it’s a small house and the stairs to the kitchen are right there, so how come she didn’t hear the boy scream and Dottie replied forcefully, “He never screamed.” Then I walked away.
So I guess it will all be in the news again soon for some reason. Might as well leave the thread open.
Mrs. Hauptmann insisted to her dying day that her beloved Bruno could never have kidnapped the Lindbergh baby, too. The desire to believe a thing is not true can be incredibly strong.
Isn’t this one of those revealing moments they use on cop and lawyer shows, where the suspect’s wife, who has claimed all along that she knew nothing about what happened, slips up by revealing that she knew they were there, and Vincent D’Onofrio throws a chair like Bobby Knight? But Matt Lauer is neither Vincent D’Onofrio nor Bobby Knight?
Pretty much. I certainly wanted to throw a chair. Lauer, otoh, wasn’t buying what she was selling but he couldn’t offend her too much, because she’d have ditched the interview. The point where he almost got her was asking about what if someone had been giving naked shower hugs to her own children. That’s where she looked confused. Then some guy - her lawyer maybe? I only watched a minute while I was waiting on my coffee - jumped in to explain vehemently that of course, he’d never personally hug a naked child in a shower, it’s all really no big deal and anyway, it was just that one kid.
It’s the Today show, of course, not GMA. Here’s the interview, if any of you self-harmers in the audience want to watch it -
I hate to bump this thread and risk further mental images of Starving and his paper towel tubes and his delusions of adequacy, but one of Sandusky’s lawyers, Karl Rominger, has surrendered his law license due to financial impropriety.
Wow, that certainly is germane. Certainly no lawyer with financial integrity would ever go to bat for Sandusky, and therefore Joe Paterno must richly deserve the idiotic pitting he came in for here.
Is that your point? Or did you just want to seize upon any opportunity that presented itself to come in here and take a swipe at me, even if the premise is lame and has nothing to do with the subject of the thread.
I think she just meant she wishes she could add something newsworthy to the thread without the terrible knowledge that you’ll be thrusting your tiny member into a soiled paper towel tube and whispering “Winning” to your tear and semen-stained photo of a prepubescent Charlie Sheen in the shower.
No, the premise is real enough, considering that appeals are still pending and probably will be for a while. But you’ve managed to take a thread about a very, very serious problem and make it all about you, and you’ve done it in an appalling, frankly disgusting way. Then you have the gall to claim that you’re “winning” the argument by somehow proving that Sandusky didn’t do what he was accused and convicted of doing.
Give it up. You’ve made yourself into the butt of a sick joke. Nothing more or less.
I see what you did there! 
(I know, I know. But this stupid thread deserves it.)
And so what’s the premise? That Sandusky’s appeals might be delayed while another lawyer is brought on board? Other than that I don’t see how his lawyer’s financial shenanigans merit mention in the thread other than to try to concoct some sort of guilt by association implication. But by all means feel free to clarify.
Problem? What problem? It was a series of crimes, not a “problem”. And what the thread was about was ding-a-lings such as yourself jumping to the conclusion that Joe Paterno knew all about it and allowed it to happen for ten years in order to protect his football program, or because he and all of Penn State’s administration were evil, sadistic pedophiles happily diddling kids themselves, and all sorts of other nonsense that no one was challenging until I showed up. And since I have virtually every claim made by you nitwits about Paterno has either been outright debunked or found totally lacking in evidence.
Ah yes, the old “make it all about you” canard. Why is it on this board that twenty people can hurl insults my way, and/or make all sorts of factually erroneous statements, and when I respond either with insults in return or to point out how their comments are in error, I’m “making the thread all about me”? Every time I hear this complaint it sounds to me like “Wah, I have nothing of substance to rebut this guy and can’t beat him otherwise, so I’ll just launch an ad hominum attack or two and hope that will chase him away.” Either that, or it’s just a way in which you try to convince yourself you have the higher ground despite the fact you have nothing to stand on.
Well, sorry, but you and yours in this thread have only yourselves to blame, as you blatantly stated you didn’t want to look at the evidence I was merely alluding to at the time, and further only a pervert or pedophile would. So you left me with no alternative to but to hit you over the head with an example you couldn’t ignore. Willful ignorance spiked with idiotic insults has its consequence.
Have you gone totally around the bend? Sandusky was expressly acquitted of the rape charge (albeit convicted of a lesser one). It ain’t hard to win with people like you making such factually wrong assertions. You remind me of the sort of person who, having decided to hate Woody Allen for screwing the child he adopted with his wife Mia Farrow, continue to insist on hating him just the same even though the reality is that Soon-Yi was not his daughter, Mia was not his wife, and Soon-Yi was in fact older than Mia was when she was screwing Frank Sinatra. But haters gotta hate, and if the facts don’t support that hatred, well, just cling to those wrong beliefs anyway and pretend the debunking never took place. (And just for some extra idiocy, get pissed off at the debunker along with it. :roll eyes:)
I’ve said before and I’ll say again that I really and truly could not care less about my estimation in the eyes of people such as you, who in your blind self-righteousness and blood lust are a greater threat to society and truly innocent people than the likes of Jerry Sandusky could ever be.