J.R. Taylor of the NY Press is a drooling idiot (somewhat long)

You know, I don’t usually get angry when people insult my favorite musicians. I mean, everyone has different tastes. Life would be pretty boring if they didn’t.

Unfortunately, this article, entitled “Hayes and Confused,” is an exception, and an offensive one at that.

The author, J.R. Taylor, inexplicably sets out to compare Isaac Hayes, a soul singer who enjoyed most of his success in the 1970s, to Tori Amos, an alternative rock (for lack of a better category) singer/songwriter/pianist who reached the height of her popularity in the 1990s. If that comparison brings to mind the Simpsons episode where Lenny and Carl compare the merits of Muhammad Ali in his prime to anti-lock brakes, you’re not alone.

Taylor begins by writing about a concert in which Hayes notes that he’s a Scientologist and offers related pamphlets to audience members. To the author, this is one of the things that makes Hayes “classy.” Of course, I would vehemently disagree, but I let it slide and kept reading as Taylor gushed on and on about the music of Isaac Hayes.

When the time finally came that J.R. could no longer muster any more glowing praise for Hayes, he clumsily segued into a pathetic tirade against Tori Amos.

Most of the rant, however, ignored whatever failings the author perceived in Tori’s music, and instead focused on denigrating her odd (but harmless) religious beliefs, among other things:

Cute. A subtle implication that she’s a sellout. Of course, the author neglects to mention that Tori hangs around for hours before or after (sometimes both!) every damn one of her shows, signing any old thing a fan will shove in front of her.

Right. I’m sure that’s what she had in mind when posing for an album cover that happens to show a little bit of cleavage. Because, you know, when I think of whorish female artists who parade their boobs around to drum up record sales, the first name to come to mind is naturally a self-described feminist who founded a rape crisis charity. :rolleyes:

Ah, so she’s also stupid and possibly racist to boot! Somehow Taylor is able to discern this from “a cute little movement.”

Stunning logic. Can I turn this statement around to say that anyone who takes a Scientologist seriously can’t goof on Tori? If so, then what the fuck are you doing, J.R.? Also, I’m perfectly capable of seperating Tori’s beliefs from her music. Somehow, the author can manage to do that with Hayes, but not with Amos. Lastly, Tori’s beliefs are all her own, and they don’t seem to hurt anyone. Compare that to the Cult of Scientology, who routinely sue and harrass critics while shamelessly swallowing up the bank accounts of their members and encouraging them to cut ties with any friends and family who don’t belong to their creepy little “church.”

Lest you should doubt Mr. Taylor’s exquisite taste in pop culture, a sentence from his last paragraph should allay your concerns:

Yup. In fact, it was cool enough to earn a whopping 2.4/10 on IMDB and the derision of virtually every critic not affiliated with the Cult.

So, is Taylor a schill for Scientology or just monumentally stupid? Either way, it’s hard to tell why a newspaper would pay actual U.S. currency for his services, when they probably could have gotten away with giving his dumb ass some Monopoly money and a used copy of “Dianetics.”

Almost certainly. This looks like it has their tendrils all over it. Why else would he throw in a completely irrelevant reference to how great Battlefield Earth was?

You know, if this guy wants to shill for the crooks and losers in the world of Scientology, i’ve got no problem with that. But his stuff about Tori Amos is just fucking psychotic.

I’m with you—i don’t usually get too worked up when people diss my favorite artists, and nor do i get very caught up in the personal lives of those artists. But the stuff in that article is just plain crap, demonstrating only what an idiot the author is and how little he knows about the subject of his story.

I loves me some singer info, but I hate when hacks stretch to sell a story.

Catholics beware, the article came from this site.

2 for 2. I think I’ll just avoid the site altogether.

You have got to be fucking kidding me. That’s a link from a post I made over 12 hours ago!

GAH!!! Hit return too fast. Fuck me running! Mods please adjust first post to the correct link and delete this and the previous post. Please, please, please!

Correct link

um. Okay, I read through that second link…

I do find it offensive, to some extent. However, inasmuch as it lacks anything even remotely resembling humor (which you’d expect from a list of “funniest” things about something), I mostly find it sad and pathetic.

Really, was that supposed to be funny?

Second link of the thread, or second of my messed up links? (Please Mods, can you clean up my 3 posts? Please? With sugar on top?)

#28 had potential. It would have been funnier if it had read, “Bears everywhere holdin it, until new Pope Elected,” though.

Otherwise it was devoid of humor and taste. Is this a signature move of NY Press?

I stopped reading the NYP years ago. It’s apparently the vanity production of some trust-fund dipshit, who prints a very long rant in the paper every week, filled with the names of expensive, exclusive and often bad restaurants he’s eaten at, celebrities he knows, and the like.

When I was reading the paper, it was often openly racist, classist and just generally obnoxious. I started reading it because it was free and dropped off in the lobby of my apartment building every week, and it was handy because it had movie and entertainment listings. After a while, I stopped, because the convenience wasn’t worth the annoyance.

Yeah, that was in pretty poor taste. Although, I have to admit that #50 made me laugh:

Most of the rest were pretty cruel, whether you like the Pope or not.

Thanks for the info. Had I known that nobody took this rag seriously, I probably would have just ignored it and moved on. I found the article while digging around for reviews of Tori’s new CD, so I hadn’t checked out the rest of the site - and now I see I can’t. My link in the OP doesn’t work, duffer’s link doesn’t work, and even going to their main page yields the error “No web site is configured at this address.” Strange.

They didn’t recently hire a former boy whore to cover the White House, did they? :eek: