Jan. 21, 2009 .Do you advise former president Bush to limit his foreign travel?

Well, it’s not just about national polls. It’s also about internal party politics. McCain isn’t going to win much insofar as internal matters go.

I dunno.

*The bullshit flows still.[/I

that would be my surname, you schmuck, What, you think I’m running around with the first name of Alaric? Or, if so, that I would expose it on the internet? I take it that you, on the other hand, are an inveterate golf player. It figures…

buy some more bandwidth, then. I’ve had too many long posts swallowed up by a bad handshake. Hence,I reply one post per interlocuter. If this is an offense, take it to the mods. If not, fuck yourself.

No, no, Fuck You.

How about you compose your fucking posts using fucking notepad, then fucking copy your fucking post into a fucking reply window?

You do know how to fucking copy and fucking paste, right?

Fuckhead.

Everyone else manages it, somehow - what the hell is wrong with you?

And you say this part -

like it’s a bad thing.

Regards,
Shodan

perhaps its my “free” wi-fi at the margin of reliable distance–perhaps you would like to underwrite an account, but you must guarantee equivalent anonymity, which would be difficult.

too much fucking trouble.

besides, what with the A.D.D. and all, short posts are all I dare attempt…

wrong again–G-dub has been devotedly drinking coca-cola ever since he heard about the constituents of the original formula.

He has the secret service searching old warehouses, flea markets and antique stores, praying to find a stash of 19th century bottles, still unopened…

On the contrary. W is known for his lack of foreign travel before becoming Pres. Wasn’t he the POTUS who’d never had a passport? I’d encourage him to travel, see the world without the bubble & the authority, & maybe start to grasp what people really thought of him.

Mind, I don’t expect him to do it.

Or, y’know, I could at least read the whole OP…

Or you could read posts #37 and 42 of this thread.

This is a moot and rather idiotic prospect, given that Bush has not committed any crimes against humanity.

well, then, he may anticipate a speedy acquittal at the Hague…

Look, you gibbering baboon, if your semi-coherent posts are constantly being lost in transit, then it only makes fucking sense to start composing your gems of wisdom in notepad, polishing your prose until it gleams, then and only then sending, and if your post gets eaten by interweb jackals before it gets her–then you just resend!

baboon

inasmuch as you style yourself “lemur”, I take it that as one type of monkey to another, we are all just a bunch of feces-hurlers here.

If you have stylistic problems with my posts, please feel free to ignore them.

juan cole, another lunatic,

You wonder if the Bushes will be able to vacation in Europe when he goes out of office, or if Pinochet’s fate awaits George
.http://www.juancole.com/

For such a thing to happen, the court would need to have the authority to try crimes commited before it was created, and it doesn’t, and “waging war without UN approval” should be a prosecutable crime, and it isn’t.

fair enough–I was using “a trip to the Hague” as a metaphor for a trip to a"virtual" Nuremburg…

I believe that the waging of aggressive warfare is a crime against humanity per the geneva accords, and was certainly on the indictment list at nuremburg.

The United Nations agreement on Iraq’s compliance with weapons inspections did reserve the right to use military force if necessary.