You are right… and I’m sorry that I ruined that moment with cheap humor. Trump is almost short enough to be a jockey… with the exception that you’d need one hell of a husky Clydesdale to lug around his huge 350 lb jiggling girth.
It would be an insult to The Cartwrights to call him “Hoss”.
Given how much of America’s money has been squandered by his ignorance, his grifting, and his lies, maybe we should just call him “Loss” ?
Personal cite: my husband (Jewish) and I (Catholic) went through all the pre-Cana stuff through the campus Catholic church. We ultimately did not pursue a church wedding, however.
I don’t know what went on when Vance and Usha got married - if he’s devout enough, likely they did some similar process and obtained the necessary dispensations. If they did NOT, then he’s not married in the eyes of the Church so no annulment is necessary, but a fair bit of confession and penance because he’s been Living In Sin.
As far as an annulment if they DID jump through all the hoops…. yeah, it can usually be accomplished but some lying may be involved as to grounds. A cousin of mine got an annulment by (I gather) stating that he went into the marriage planning to never have children.
Entirely possible. He had apparently been raised in an Evangelical family, but rejected Christianity and became an atheist. He claims that he began to re-examine faith while he was in law school, which would have been 2010-13 (i.e., six to nine years before he officially converted to Catholicism). So, who knows?
As I noted a few posts back: Vance was not a Catholic in 2014, when he married Usha; he was an atheist. So, “would he need an annulment” really isn’t relevant, because they were not married in the Catholic Church.
Actually, AIUI, the church considers marriages between two non-Catholics to be valid, i.e., binding, marriages unless proven otherwise.
So while Vance would not have needed an annulment to remarry as a Catholic after ending his non-Church-sanctioned marriage had he been a Catholic at the time of that marriage, he would need an annulment to remarry in the Church after having been previously married as a non-Catholic.
Because marriage to a non-Catholic partner in a non-Church-approved legal marriage ceremony is not a valid marriage for a Catholic, and hence requires no annulment for remarriage eligibility within the Church, but is valid for a non-Catholic, so it does need annulment. Funky, huh?
And, interestingly, Erika Kirk was raised and baptized a Catholic; I had assumed that she was some flavor of Evangelical Protestant, but it appears that she may still be a practicing Catholic.
I think that about the closest she’d ever be to Catholic would be if she and JD had a date at a White Sox game ( and if Noah Schultz beaned her with a wild pitch ).
“There seems to be some confusion on the field. It seems like a wild pitch may have struck a fan. An ’ E ’ is showing on the scoreboard, but umpires are reviewing. And now the ’ E ’ has been replaced with a cross.”