CA: Holy shit. I thought you were had invented a quote, but I just noticed that there’s a video up on the page with the interview’s gloss, and yep… that’s what he said.
Starts at the video 1:10 in and Wright alleges that “the Jewish vote” and “the AIPAC vote” are “controlling” Obama, they will not “let” him send representatives to the Darfur conference and that they, not any unnamed (but OBVIOUSLY specific!!!) staffers will not let Obama talk to him because they don’t want him talking to someone who calls a spade a spade.
And it looks like I was correct that the “them Jews” was the same exact group as the “they” who wouldn’t let Obama act as he wanted. Evidently due to them “controlling” him.
So, yep, Wright did indeed mean to say that American Jews are controlling the President and that those Jews were the ones who would not “let” Obama speak to wright.
Revolting.
As is Dio’s kneejerk apologia for this antisemite piece of shit.
Of course, Dio has also gone from attempts to divert the discussion by irrelevantly bringing up comments about how anti-Zionism isn’t anti-Semitism to claiming that maybe Wright was just (ya know, politically relevantly) using “Jews” as shorthand for “Zionist fanatics.”
Dio: you stupid son of a bitch, you’re the one who just claimed that Wright was talking about “them Jews” because maybe he believed that they were “Zionist fanatics”. That means he thinks Jews=Zionists or he’d just have said “Zionists”. We also have a direct recording of his words where we says that the American Jews are “controlling” Obama in a number of ways and that they’re “Zionists”, so to him “American Jews” also = “Zionists”.
Your denial is so disgusting as to be morally repugnant.
With the audio right there for you to listen to, you still have not retracted your idiotic spew about how Wright was talking about Emanuel and/or Axelrod when in fact he was talking about neither, but all of American Jewry in general. (or if you want to wriggle, only those over the age of majority) You haven’t condemned him for his racism, and your apologia for it has in fact gotten more absurd with each passing posts. Of course, as you also didn’t retract your earlier lies about my position either, so it seems that yet again you’ve taken to lying in order to support your bullshit all the way through.
Now you are claiming that objecting to Wright alleging that American Jews “control” Obama’s actions means that someone is “hysterical” and if they’re offended by such blatant anti-Semitism then they must “perpetually” be offended. Because as we all know someone being upset by the “Jews control the government” canard must simply be a “crybaby” member of the offendarati.
And you are condoning and offering up an apologia for blatant racism.
That’s because you’re a toad, a liar, a fool, and either someone who condones racism or an actual racist yourself. I’m no longer sure, as your act of feigned stupidity is approaching Gonzomax territory.
As for your continued apologia for anti-Semitism, how fucking stupid are you?
He “meant to say” Zionists?
Yeah, people all the time plan on saying 'I object to these specific Israeli policies" and instead they say “Them Jews control the United States!”
Honest mistake… you fucking syphilitic ape?
Yeah, Wright’s now claiming that instead of Jews, who he mentioned by name twice, he really “meant” to say “Zionists”. Both times. The words sound so very much alike! And you, being scum, had already given him the perpetual racist’s out by alleging that due to it being “politically relevant” maybe he was just conflating “them Jews” as a whole with “Zionists”.
And still no retraction to your earlier idiocy about how he was “OBVIOUSLY!” only talking about Emanuel and maybe Axelrod, eh?
(Let alone the fact that even in his “anti-[del]Judaism[/del] Zionism”, wright is reduced to lying about fictional “ethnic cleansing”)
It really shows something about you that when Wright alleges that American Jews “control” the president, you hop up quickly to defend such racism and claim that those who object must be “indignation addicts”. I suppose you figure once you’ve already started to make a fool of yourself and lied a good few times, why not invent a pattern and call it perpetual indignation anyways, as long as you’re lying through your teeth to start with.
I don’t think it matters much if you’re a racist or you’re simply doing your best to condone racism. You’re a waste of carbon in either case, Dio. Masturbate to a copy of the Protocols and fuck off this message board, kay? (The Tzarist forgery says “Jews” by accident too. It’s really talking about “Zionists”.)
Go over to stormfront and talk about those [del]Jews[/del] Zionists and how they’re perpetually offended crybabies for daring to be offended by lies about a ZOG.
Why not? I mean, it’s totally believable. Someone catches you on your way to the car and you start ranting about how “Them Jews won’t let Obama speak to me” and “the Jewish, the AIPAC vote controls Obama” and you really meant to say “Zionists”. (Because lying about a country and being bigoted against people who think that country should exist is totally better than lying about an ethnic group)
Just like Mel Gibson. He was surprised and caught off guard, and it all would have been okay if he’d just said “Zionists start all wars, sugartits.”
I don’t think you’re a racist, Diogenes. I do think you give any benefit of the doubt required to help protect Obama’s image. I would give this one up, if I were you…this kind of help he doesn’t need.
Largely because you’re a liar and making it up, eh, toad?
You just can’t stop lying, can you?
I clearly said that you are definitely condoning racism, and you are. Few other than partisan apologists lying as fast as they can in the service of condoning racism, like yourself, would be confused on that point,
I also clearly said that, as a possibility, you may actively support racism as well as ‘merely’ condoning it. If you didn’t have your head up your ass, you’d realize that was quite possible in someone who, as absurdly and dishoenstly as you’ve done, went out of their way to condone blatant racism.
As you are a habitual liar, however, you’re again simply making shit up when you lie and claim that I said you “must” be a racist when I specifically said I wasn’t sure. You’re not even a good liar.
But why stop lying now, eh?
(or retract your earlier kneejerk spew about how Wright was talking about Axelrod and/or Emanuel).
Just keep it up. Wright’s clear racism is okay if, instead, it’s simply clear bigotry and that instead of claims of a Jewish Occupied Government we’ve got claims of a Zionist Occupied Government committed to ethnic cleansing.
Toad.
Yet again, go fuck off to a community more conducive to your drive to condone racism where you can elaborate on your ideas that “hysterical” “crybaby” “indignation addict Jews” object to claims that they control the country.
Well, help me out here: Why is “Them Zionists don’t let Obama talk to me” any better? And why is the “clarification” believable? He “clarified” that “the Jewish vote, the AIPAC [American Israel Public Affairs Committee] that’s controlling him . . . will not let him talk to someone who calls a spade what it is.” Link, my emphasis. “Let him” talk to him? “Controlling him”?
I’m not busting your chops, calling you a liar or racist or anything, but seriously, dude, give it up. You’re putting lipstick on a pig.
No, even then it wouldn’t be the same – not unless 99% of the “Neocons” happened to be, say, Catholic; unless “Neocon” were widely-known to be code for “Catholic”; and unless he also referred to “the Catholic vote,” thereby neatly undercutting the implication that he was drawing any distinction between the two.