Oh, I thought we were applying reason.
Carry on.
your basically saying nothing can exist without its opposite. So, what is the opposite of a blade of grass?
lol. What is the tilt a table reference?
What if it directly contradicts what I feel? What if it directly contradicts reality as most know it to be? If you feel that you have the ability to drink 20 ounces of gasoline without harm to yourself, what will happen to you?
Seances.
A lawnmower.
I’d probably die, but I wouldn’t think it was because of the gasoline.
Sorry to disappoint, but isn’t reason subjective like everything else?
Or antimatter grass.
Geezer: “Keep off my lawn!”
<BOOM>
Geezer: “Told ya!”
I don’t know why, but I’m getting major Yakety Sax when I try picturing that scene.
No, it is not.
How would you know? you were indoctrinated since you were a small child that what he wrote was “deep” because he wrote it. This fallacy leads to the next fallacy that other works cannot be deep if he did not write them. You have merely redefined “deep” to mean “written by Swedenborg”. What do you know of other religions and the many centuries of thought that have gone into them?
Don’t our basic assumptions determine what we find to be reasonable?
What would it be because of, if not the gasoline?
So the OP is just argument 123, right?
ETA: Also argument 367
Determine? No.
I’m not trying to argue that God exists.
What determines what an individual finds reasonable?
nm…
nm