Wow. I just read something in Great Debates that changed my mind on something.
I’ve long believed that we’ll never know the whole story behind the assassination of “jfk”*…
But you’ve got a point. I think I WILL let it go. Finally…
If it came out that a cadre of Cubans bought LBJ a bassett hound so that Marilyn could sneak Joe DiMaggio into the Book Depository with help from known Magic Bullet inventor Grassy Noll… it’d be fascinating, but it really wouldn’t change anything.
We’d still have Donald with his tiny finger on the button…
I think we could start a Lower Case Truther Movement based on why the OP doesn’t capitalize jfk half the time…
Recent analysis of the autopsy photos and forensic and ballistic recreations show that it is more likely that the mismatches are due to errors in handling or bad memory of some of the ones that reported many of the inconsistencies.
Agreed. Also, it’s history, in general. We like learning stuff about the past. If a new cache of Napoleon Bonaparte’s papers surfaced from some dusty old archive…we’d be delighted! It would be great!
If some brand-new evidence (ha!) came to light regarding LHO – maybe the Russians have some old KGB file on him that hasn’t been released yet – that would be interesting. Surely not earth-shaking. Maybe not even of interest to anyone other than assassination afficionados (which includes people who accept the conventional account, as well as conspiracy nuts.) It would be historical…and that’s good!
I have never believed that the assassination was the work of a single gunman. Who the other one was and who, if anybody, was in a wider conspiracy is something I don’t need an opinion on. The best book I ever read on the subject was “Six Seconds in Dallas”.
One question: If Oswald was the lone gunman, why not begin shooting when the motorcade was on Houston St, heading toward the TSDB? Why wait till it was on Elm, heading away, if not to coordinate shots with a second gunman in place?
One thing is clear, regardless of the actual circumstances of the assassination, the Warren Commission investigation was a farce mandated to collect evidence to fit the theory rather than creating the theory after viewing the evidence.
I do not, until and unless you can summarize what exactly your alternate theory is. It’s not enough to try to point out some imagined inconsistencies. How was Kennedy’s head propped up for the pictures… seriously? They put something under his neck, duh. His “forehead bone” was missing or whatever? So what?
Besides, the fact that you won’t put in the effort to proofread yourself for grammar and punctuation suggests a lack of respect. If your first language is not English, I would make allowances.
The mortician’s description of the wounds during his interview with Joe West,
which Roy Schaeffer obtained from him and transmitted to David W. Mantik, M.D., Ph.D.
“My reason for postulating this is the interview I conducted of Dr. Dick Davis of the AFIP […]
Most of that copy pasta comes from someone reading David Lifton, best reply against the bizarre multiple casket, body altering theory comes from Thomas Powers, Gerald Posner, Vincent Bugliosi and others.
Please observe fair use guidelines and copy/paste sparingly. I’ve edited multiple posts as a result.
Please dial it back - this is unnecessarily inflammatory.
None of this seems like original content by the OP so I’m closing this thread. If there is a desire to have actual discussion with original ideas feel free to start another thread.