JFK Assassination Controversy

JFK Cover up- The whole messy thing

JFK- The Medical Cover Up (Douglas Horne) (check it out on utube)

The following essay is based on the work of david s lifton and Douglas Horne

(Douglas horne was a member of the medical review board established by pres clinton that released many documents)

After much reading (before the movie jfk) this is what I believe about the jfk assassination. If you can not stand the stark unvarnished truth do not read more.
As you may know the head snap of jfk in the zapruder film is not consistent with shots only coming from the Texas School Book Depository. So something is wrong with the warren commission conclusion of 3 shots coming from behind. (Same thing basically from the House Committee conclusions in 1979).

[deleted by Bone]

Well, the movie is over 25 years old. The new updated Director’s cut addresses all your concerns. It’s only findable on the dark web though so good luck.

Welcome to the SDMB.

Unfortunately, all your allegations have been dealt with many times over. I refer you to the invaluable MacAdams JFK Assassination site (McAdams's Kennedy Assassination Home Page Index) for all your conspiracy theory needs.

For instance, there is nothing uncommon about the JFK head snap. Etc., etc.

Regards,
Shodan

Wait, what controversy?

<cough>bullshit<cough>

TLDR; but it’s bullshit.

If you want your ideas to be taken more seriously, I suggest taking the time to proofread for syntax and grammar. It’ll make your argument look more scholarly, less squirrely.

Assuming you’re capable of logical thought, work backwards from this phenomenally complex coordinated effort to just how many people would have to be actively involved to make it work. If your total doesn’t come close to the 1963 population of the US, you aren’t trying hard enough.

My conclusions are not from the movie JFK.
Read Douglas Hornes Books or see his videos on U TUBE.
He was a part of the ARRB Board.

The movement of the head backwards is a problem for me with him being officially shot from behind- How can that be ?

The mismatch of OFFICIAL photos and xrays in the OFFICIAL record is also a problem.

Why do we have a picture of an intact jfk face in the death stare photo and an x ray with missing skull in the head down to the eye orbit.

The x ray shows no skull bone on part of the face along with other areas of the head.
How was a picture taken of jfks face on the autopsy table with no bone underneath the rt forehead area.

**Most people do not realize the investigation in 1978-79 The HSCA one.

It found probable cause for a conspiracy on 11-22-63. The matter was turned over to the justice dept and it has not acted on it.**
There are problems with the back of the head wounding also. But I will discuss that later.
I want to deal with the official photos/xrays mis match problem for now.

Douglas Horne has a few videoshttp://youtu.be/VoJ7tikaGBE
http://youtu.be/jWpmN7ZEaRA

I can’t figure out what you’re objecting to. Literally, your comments are incoherent.

Jet effect.
Cite.

Penn and Teller demonstrate.

How quickly can we move on from this to the Moon Landing hoax?

That’s my favourite!

I apologise for the text as it was originally something I typed on another computer.
I used it on another board and did a copy and paste from my writing.

My objections are clearly stated as the mis-match in photo records mentioned above.

The x rays and photos can’t all be true. The reason for the ARRB review was because of this mis match. I would love to provide photos but I do not think there allowed here- they are on the internet.

Listen to the videos and you will understand my issues.

The forehead bone cant be missing from a shooting and later on take a photo of a forehead with the skin intact.

Mistaken or falsified xray/photos in the official govt investigations are a logical explanation. Whats going on there.

I have yet to deal with the back of the head wounding problems.

Can you explain why there is a mis match between the official xrays and official autopsy photos.

They were released at diff times.

You can not have intact skin and missing bone on jfks head at the same location with out suspicion being drawn- namely the rt forehead area.

Links to photos are allowed.

Even assuming there is a discrepancy of some kind, what’s your alternative hypothesis? Let’s even assume the autopsy and everything associated with it is 100% fake. So what? That doesn’t change that Kennedy was murdered and Oswald shot him from the Book Depository.

saturncomet
Prepare to have your mind blown by the next question I post.

Why should anybody care who killed JFK?

JFK, & those who worked with him are dead.
So is his wife.
And children.
And siblings.
And, everybody who could possibly gain from his death, are also dead.
Even Fidel.

Justice?
No.
No justice can be served here. The grave has claimed everybody.
Even if there was a conspiracy…everybody’s dead.
I don’t care too much about President James Garfield’s assassination.
Nor does anybody else, save a few History buffs.
Why should we care about JFK?
Old news, Dude.
Let it go.

I used to be a Kennedy truther, until I thought about it. First shot went wide. Oswald, a trained marksman, gave up on the scope, which is offset on a M-C, and dropped to the more familiar iron sights. From there, given the range, the shots were easy. Bang-bang, the deed was done.

Because it utterly changed the course of US and world history, and understanding that yes, goddammit, one lone nut CAN do that is an important lesson to remember.