I thought I was familiar with just about all of the JFK evidence, but a thread in another forum has brought up something new to me. Two Brains Examined appeared in the Washington Post in 1998, saying that a Douglas Horne wrote a memo that two separate brain exams may have been conducted, because of very conflicting reports from two doctors about the exam. This site has a lengthier discussion of the new revelations.
It wouldn’t seem surprising that these people could have different memories of something that happened 35 years before, even with extrememly significant events. Jumping to the conclusion that there were two different brains, with the implications for a vast conspiracy, seems to be unwarranted. Have there been any critiques of this conclusion?
No inputs on this? I know it’s asking a lot for facts on the GD board, but since it involved the JFK assassination, I thought I would try here instead of GQ.
It’s not that we’re ignoring you, Curt, it’s just that we’ve all been busy buying gas masks and ironing our Swiss Colony Christmas catalogs.
I click on the first link, am immediately confused. Evidently there were two autopsies, or no, there weren’t…What?..
I click on the second link and with the very first words my Snopes alarm goes off:
Awww, Currrrrrt… you KNOW better than that. How long you been here, anyway? Anytime you see the words “Forward this to everyone you know!” it’s a dead giveaway that it’s spam. On that basis alone, dude…