I don’t think the “scapegoat” is a valid option. It’s not like the school was using that as a way to put an end to the criticism. Paterno was fired because his actions were incompatible with the position he held. Others bore more responsibility for the crimes, and they are also being fired and prosecuted.
I think scapegoat fits–I think they both fit. He did something wrong, but he’s also received a disproportionate amount of the blame. If you weren’t actually looking at the news stories, and just the reactions, you wouldn’t even have known Sandusky’s name for a few weeks.
And I do think that now everyone is so spent that those other people involved are not getting the public ire they deserve. If they’d have let Paterno retire at the end of the season like he wanted to, I think these other people would have been in the news faster and caught up when people hadn’t yet hit the outrage fatigue.
I’d vote for “none of the above.” My take on JoPa was that towards the end he was a senile old man who had been allowed to stick around for too long, and that he simply lacked the mental capacity to fully comprehend or appreciate the significance of what was occuring.
Can we please get into the debate about how many slapping sounds make up a rhythm? THAT was obviously the most poignant part of the previous discussion on this issue. If you can answer that, then you’ve got whether he was a scapegoat or not.