I’d be surprised if it doesn’t get canceled, especially given the Fox Network’s infamous track record, but anything Joss Whedon gets involved with is worth watching (or reading, for that matter).
[/QUOTE]
That damned Fox Network, giving us shows like The Simpsons.
Whedon has an amazing track record (for good shows, that is. Not necessarily shows that stay on the air.) I have little doubt that it will be a quality show, and I am hoping against all hope that it will last more than a handful of episodes.
[QUOTE=RickJay]
That damned Fox Network, giving us shows like The Simpsons.
[/QUOTE]
I watched the Simpsons last night for the first time in a long, long time. What a waste of time. It’s fallen so far that I hardly recognized it. I think they are now using unemployed high school dropouts to write the material.
Based on what? The massive success he had with Firefly? Whedon may be a talented person and have a strong fan cult but the networks look at him and see a guy who’s had some big flops.
[QUOTE=Little Nemo]
Based on what? The massive success he had with Firefly? Whedon may be a talented person and have a strong fan cult but the networks look at him and see a guy who’s had some big flops.
[/QUOTE]
Don’t forget the huge box office of Serenity, now!
[QUOTE=pepperlandgirl]
2) Alexis is currently not working. I’m thinking he’s just playing with the dogs and pleasuring his wife–which is great for him, but not really pressing engagements.
[/QUOTE]
You have a very troubling notion of what constitutes a pressing engagement.
[QUOTE=ShibbOleth]
I watched the Simpsons last night for the first time in a long, long time. What a waste of time. It’s fallen so far that I hardly recognized it. I think they are now using unemployed high school dropouts to write the material.
[/QUOTE]
I’m sure “Firefly” would probably lose a lot of steam by Season 17, too.
The weird criticism of Fox for cancelling shows ignores the fact that Fox gives shows a chance that would never, ever get a shot anywhere else; in fact, their success is responsible, in part, for a general improvement in the variety and quality of TV series over the last 15 years or so. (There are other factors too; I’m not just crediting Fox.) You can bitch and whine about “Firefly,” but it’s hard to deny that Fox has also put a lot of good shows on TV for at least three or four seasons that would not have gotten a chance anywhere else, or if they did get a chance would have been altered ten times as much. If “Arrested Development” had been on CBS it would have had a laugh track.
As for the OP, I’m skeptical. Whedon’s schtick is “Pretty girl who does karate stuff” - he couldn’t even bring himself to not do it in his sci-fi show. It’s a schtick that’s awfully played out, and unless he’s bringing something new to the table, this show will probably go the way of Eliza Dushku’s last show, “Tru Calling,” which lasted 27 episodes.
[QUOTE=Big Bad Voodoo Lou]
I’d be surprised if it doesn’t get canceled, especially given the Fox Network’s infamous track record, but anything Joss Whedon gets involved with is worth watching . . .
[/QUOTE]
You misspelled “Eliza Dushku,” but otherwise, amen and hallelujah!