Lamar Alexander (R)'s Chief of Staff is under investigation for allegedly having child porn on his computer. Alexander already put him on unpaid leave and issued a statement expressing his disappointment etc.
The question: How will Rush spin this, and do you predict he will find a way to make this ultimately the fault of liberals/Democrats?
He ignores it.
Probably this. But if he mentions it at all, it will be to decry the liberal media’s “pouncing” on this story to divert attention away from the Obamacareocalpyse, or the Uncle Obama affair, or Benghazi, or [insert scandal here]. And he’ll probably provide a few examples of Democrats who sinned similarly, and claim that the media ignored them.
Oh, and then he’ll go take a massive shit and wipe his ass with a roll of fresh $100 bills.
He’s not going to worry about a potential Republican pedophile when you have a dummocrat president shaking hands at funerals! Wake up sheeple.
He would ponder why Lamar Alexander hired a Democrat to be his Chief of Staff ?
That. Until Rush finds out that the guy had an uncle who was a Democrat, then all best are off.
Priests are pedobears. Pope is Catholic and Marxist. Catholic illegal alien pedophiles are swamping America with baby rapers. Writes itself, really.
He’ll just report the story and call Alexander a Democrat.
This is not really an election issue or topic.
Off to IMHO.
What’s the Uncle Obama affair?
Thanks, Tomndeb, for the forum change. You’re right.
Isn’t that more of a Fox News prediction?
The White House said Obama had never lived with (maybe never even met?) an uncle of his. Then Obama said he actually lived with the guy for a semester in law school.
More than 6 billion people on the earth probably bought the explanation that “the White House” was speaking out of ignorance, and had neglected, somehow, to get Obama’s facts from him directly.
The others probably really enjoy Rush Limbaugh’s show, and think it’s a significant conspiracy.
All partisanship aside, it sounds like Alexander is treating this in exactly the right way; Rush could easily praise him for doing so, the better to segue into saying that Obama should likewise express disappointment and put staffers on unpaid leave for – well, take your pick, folks…
Ooh, nice one! You might have a talent for this…
This is not any kind of a scandal, I agree – who cares if Obama met with, lived with for a time, or exchanged Arbor day gifts with, an uncle?
But I think your explanation: “…the ‘White House’ was speaking out of ignorance, and had neglected, somehow, to get Obama’s facts from him directly,” is a bit tortured. It boggles the mind to imagine anyone saying, “Hmmm… we need to answer the question about Obama ever meeting or living with his uncle. How in the world can we find out if he did?”
I think they either chose not to ask him, so they’d be able to claim they didn’t ask him, or they did ask him and then lied about his answer.
Either way, who cares? The only reason they felt they had to lie is because the issue has some sort of phony pseudo-importance to it that causes Obama-haters to proclaim it the clues to a huge conspiracy and then reflexively causes Obama supporters to fashion bending-over-backwards defenses…such as yours.
Rush will probably demand to know what sort of police state has its postal service arrest people for sex crimes, and make something up about Obama’s sweeping expansion of postal service investigatory powers “in defiance of Congress”.
He’ll ignore it. If he did touch it, he would deride the permissive Hollywood liberals who promote alternative lifestyles and the feminazis who make themselves so unappealing that men have no choice but to look elsewhere for outlet.
I admit that that’s much more believable than him blaming “Obamacare” and the teachers unions by stating that because of them right thinking 'mericans now have to home-school their children’s sex education. :smack:
I Can Hear It Now- “Its an internet curriculum that may well soon be endorsed by such lofty institutions as The University of Phoenix…”