No, you don’t seem to get it. You originally answered a question intended for another poster. That question was, “if it is so easy and obvious of an answer to you as to how to avoid personal internet issues, then why are so many millions of people having so many problems?”
To which you stepped in and answered for her with “they lack self control”.
Ok, and well and good. I then asked you a follow up, “Why do you think so many millions of people, many of whom are incredibly smart and accomplished in their own right, seem to lack such basic life tools?”
To which you replied, “because they lack self control”.
I’ll ask you again, are you stuck on repeat? Yes, you believe people develop online problems because they lack self control. Good. Got it. Did you forget to keep reading when i then asked why it might be that so many people, many of whom are quite successful, lack these basic life tools like self-control, self-awareness?
People have been saying that since the early 1990s, and yet trolls still haven’t gone away. At some point, you have acknowledge that this maxim is not actually valid.
Yes, in theory it should work. Trolls are out for attention, and ignoring them should make them leave. But, in practice, people don’t agree on who is trolling. Or they think that there is something that needs a response.
The whole point of trolling is that they are attempting to trick you into getting upset. Expecting absolutely everyone to not ever fall for these tricks is foolish. And that’s what it takes for it to work–if a troll gets one person to respond, that’s enough to keep them around.
An analogy might be abstinence-only education. . It’s something that, in theory should work, but all it takes is one mistake for it to fail. And, so, in practice, you actually wind up the same or worse than you started.
Of course you did. You could have made paper clips into a necklace or perfected the art of doodling. I suspect if nobody ever responded to your posts (and I’m not suggesting they shouldn’t), you’d be a little let down. But maybe I’m wrong and you’re merely posting to see yourself post because somehow that’s more interesting than anything else you could be doing. If so, I guess people will interpret them as such and won’t feel the need to respond.
You know that with a mouse wheel it’s trivial to scroll past the 3-4 posts you don’t want to respond to or read and engage with the post you’d like to? You know that’s an option available to everybody? At least in PC land.
The real issue is that people get upset that there isn’t unanimity of thought. That’s an intrinsic problem and shouldn’t be the concern of the board. When and where I grew up we were taught that different people have different opinions and that that’s ok.
There are plenty of posters who usually disagree with most other Dopers but aren’t constantly Pitted (or have multiple ATMB threads about them). Your continual assertions that many or most Dopers insist on “unanimity of thought” is contradicted by the actual posting on the board.
But I do see a tendency on the part of some Dopers to be tone-deaf re: how opinions are expressed. I get it that the SDMB should thrive on free and open discussion, which requires two sides (at least). That doesn’t mean there are no boundaries. Surely nobody sees “the only good _______ are dead ________” as the level of debate we want here. Characterizing an objection to that phrasing as simply unaccepting of differing opinions would be foolish.
That’s ridiculous and the furthest thing from the reality. Unanimity of thought would be boring. After two or three posts what more is there to say?
The problem is the various techniques of dishonest posting intended only to inflame and disrupt. A number of current and former posters have engaged in the practice ceaselessly.
I suspect if nobody ever responded to your posts (and I’m not suggesting they shouldn’t), you’d be a little let down. But maybe I’m wrong and you’re merely posting to see yourself post because somehow that’s more interesting than anything else you could be doing. If so, I guess people will interpret them as such and won’t feel the need to respond.