Well, why don’t you explain what you’ve been trying to say plainly. It seems that what I discern as an attempt to be cute is getting in the way. What is your point?
I think he is trying to suggest you are some kind of ditto-head who can’t think for yourself.
That’s a favorite tactic of those who want to avoid the issue itself.
Be thankful you didn’t use an unauthoirized source for a cite…btw, has that list been updated lately?
Oh, I’m sure he’s trying to do something like that, its just I can’t figure out specifically what this time. I’d like ho to state it so he can try to defend it. It appears he realizes that I’m not going to let his oblique insult stand without scrutiny and has decided to run away. I’m shocked!
Which list?
I dunno, but in any case there could be no rational justification for ever including the WSJ editorial section on it (post #20).
Sorry, I have to ask: Did you actually count???
At any rate, this reminds me of a History Professor of mine. He wrote a 300 page book, and a published review took him to task for using the same word twice in the volume! Hilarious.
Point? Yeah, I *bet *you’d like a point.
hh
Brain Glutton,
Do you think that such an example of voter intimidation (Obama himself has made an issue of voting rights) would have been dropped had it been whites intimidating others?
Yes, of course if journalists share your biases it isn’t surprising that it’s a ‘non story’. You don’t want to know about it and neither do they. Again, if you reverse the races it would fit into the liberal narrative of white oppressor/black victim & would be a huge story.
Certainly, if it were any of the last five Republican administrations making the call.
:rolleyes: Dude, be serious. If the Washington Times is the best thing you’ve got and Michelle Malkin and the WSJ Editorial section are the runners-up, it’s a nonstory.
Huh? The vote was 15 to 14, along party lines.
Wrong. Malkin is smart as a whip. You don’t like her for that very reason. Too bad.
As I said, it is a non-story because it doesn’t fit the narrative of white oppressor/black victim. Reverse the races and a Republican administration dropping the charges & you have a big story. Protests by Al Sharpton etc…
This should tell everyone all they ever need to know about you.
Sorry, the heroin hadn’t worn off yet.
See below.
hh
Sorry, I have to ask…did you actually go back and count the reprehensibles??
hh
What does that actually tell us (or you)?
-
That Malkin is not very smart and everybody knows that?
-
That the liberal referred to is actually open minded and willing to listen to intelligent conservatives… and dislikes Malkin for some other reason?
-
That the “too bad” was mean and out of the norm around here.