So this is what it feels like to be ignored by someone who is ignored by everyone else.
Being liberal is usually enough to get you the benefit of the doubt on this board but you chased away all doubt a long time ago.
So this is what it feels like to be ignored by someone who is ignored by everyone else.
Being liberal is usually enough to get you the benefit of the doubt on this board but you chased away all doubt a long time ago.
You notice right because the last time it was proposed the assault weapons bill was soundly defeated. And while a few Democrats did vote against it, once again the Republicans were the ones that voted against it and many other proposals.
He isn’t. Just cowardly. The evil ones are those who literally cannot understand Thou Shalt Not Kill.
Never killing? How can you win a war?
Far too much freedom has already been lost.
I don’t create a danger for you.
Life is precious, that’s why people should be free to live as they see fit, not dictated to by sanctimonious idiots like you.
So all gun owners should be presumed guilty until proven innocent? That’s an arbitrary and ad hoc argument.
Why not ban Muslim immigration while we’re at?
No. Not at all. I’m just like you, brother. I think every crank with an attitude should have access every weapon in every caliber with big gigantic 1,000 round magazines so that he can grease as many people as he wants in the most efficient way possible.
See. I can exclude middles too.
You’ve no doubt had much practice.
I’ve not read the whole thread - frankly, the arguments from both sides are beating a long-dead horse and no-one is being won over to the other side - so I do not know if anyone has posted this yet. If so: my apologies.
If not, I present to you “Thoughts and Prayers: the game”
Oooh one of those! So often seen in the wild, so rare to have one to study.
If we ask it for actual evidence of “too much freedom has already been lost” will it actually have real examples or will it just ignore us?
CMC fnord!
Oh, Waymore has been perfectly willing to give examples. Some of them may surprise you.
What the fuck does that even mean in context? You are the one excluding middles all over hell and gone. But then again, seeing as you don’t even recognize a fallacy when you use one I guess I do have more experience in this arena. After all, I know what I’m talking about and you don’t.
16 Democrats voted against the AWB. That’s like a third of Democrats. Pretty much Democrats from every swing state.
What “many other proposals” are you talking about?
I’ve ducked no question, won’t start now.
You just did. How about now?
Umm, you do know that,even officially, there are more guns in Australia now, than before the firearms restrictions?
Right?
Officially firearm ownership per household rates is lower (from ~15% of households to ~ 8%). But there is no evidence the legislation ahd any effect on the trend. It had declined ~10% in the decade prior to the legislation and has declined by about the same amount in the the twenty years since.
As far as the actual figures, nobody knows. We know there are about 200, 000 illegal firearms circulating in a nation of 20 million people. That’s near enough one illegal firearm for every 100 people: man, woman and baby.
The number of firearms suicides declined consistently from 1991 to 1998 (legislation being introduced in 2006).
To suggest that there are “still” Australians with guns is incredibly misleading. There are probably more Australians with guns now than before the legislation. At best the ratio of Australians with ready access to legally owned forearms has halved.
Moreover,
To suggest that there has been any reduction firearm suicide rate, let alone overall suicide rate, is doubtful at best.
Suicide rates are small and fluctuate all the time.It has increased by 3% over the past 10 years, for example.. Yes, it declines following the buyback, but no more than the current trend. In fact it peaked in 1998, two years after the buyback ended. This peak was associated with a near doubling of the rate of hanging, and occurred despite a 60% fall in firearm suicides between 1988 and 1998.
Moreover as obvious options like firearms decline, options like driving into an oncoming truck become preferred, and are almost impossible to determine as suicide.
Maybe there has been a decline on actual (as opposed to determinable) suicide rates, concomitant with firearm ownership, but it’s impossible to determine. Australia currently has more firearms but a lower suicide rate. the rate of hanging has increased, but the rate of shooting has declined.
As with all the arguments, the statistics are uncertain. The unvarnished facts are:
This can, and has been, argued as evidence for or against the effect of the buyback. The truth is that it’s ambiguous data with no change form the multi decadal trend.
If someone tried to use similar data based on a three year spike to argue against climate change you would be all over them for ignoring the multi decadal trend
Try being consistent and honest with this data as well. then tell us what you actually see in that data. Is there really a statistically significant decline between 98 and 2015 that rusn counter to the 63-15 trend.
(Heads up, I’ve run some stats on the data, and I’ll trot them out in future climate change threads if you say the 98-15 data is a significant sign of reversal of the multi decadal trend.)
Right, that was going to be my next point in case the gun proponents still make a lot of hay about opposing measures like what Australia did. Because indeed I have heard a lot of the gun proponents claiming that all guns were confiscated, not the case.
As for your nonsensical dare about comparing trends, I looked at more recent studies, so your talk about a 3 year spike makes no sense. (Actually like a good climate change denier you point at studies with graphs that just ended in 2001 just to make the sorry 3 year spike point).
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/05/world/australia/australia-gun-ban-shooting.html?_r=0
Ask a question and I’ll answer.
There is some freedom lost right there. Don’t worry the state is your friend.