Ladies... ur imagination is required...

Number 1 is out becuase I had rather have a man that can THINK he’s way out of a problem

Number 2, most likely, depending on a few things

Number 3, no no. I am shy, I don’t need a shy guy too.

Number 4 is not likely becuase I like rules and order. And I have a close relationship with my mother, so I’d like for her to approve

Number 5…well, I not into poetry, but a guy into it wouldn’t be too bad. If his beliefs were someone close to mine, I think he would win, but I have strong beliefs too. If our beliefs were too different, it would cause a lot of problems. Overall, he sounds like a good catch.

well poor number 4 is without any votes…
i like the man that will get me anything, especially kinky underwear… besides, i love the long curls… bad boys on the outside are usually the big hearts on the inside

You’ve described five men that most women in the USA would go for in a second. Even #3 is a “good-looking” nerd.
Yeah, we’ll take them all.

I broke it down to the important stuff. And in that order. I love intelligent men, and they have to be nice guys too. Other than that it’s all fair game, but the nice hands and looks are nice, too!

Yeah, he’s calculating and methodical, but it seems to me that that’s only when it’s needed. MMMM #2!

Sorry, I’ll stay single. None of them appeal to me. The ones that had the personality were too skinny. The ones who were nice and upholstered weren’t my type. You forgot the sweet, redheaded, muscle-y but chunky, teddy-bearish, super-intelligent computer nerd who can also dance like the famed “Rubberband man” of the 70s song.

No wonder I’ll be doomed to singlehood after Luke and I split.

Can I try Sir 1.5 please?

I was all about 1 except that medium smarts thing killed it, I like to be challenged. 2 sounds like he might be a little too challenging altogether, though. So, gimme 2’s intelligence with 1’s spontaneity and commanding presence and I’ll be all good.

4 sounds interesting, in the “I’d be interested in a meaningful overnight relationship” sorta way. Nice place to visit but I stopped wanting to live there once I was legal drinking age.

I don’t know if it’s just me, but the looks information was nearly as disconcerting as the weapons stuff. Obviously you can’t find the individual repulsive, but who dates a ‘type’ instead of a person?

Number 3, with no interest at all in the others.

They all sound like contestants on a reality tv show to me but if I had to choose one it would be number 3. He is voted least likely to give me any crap. #1 sounds like Fabio. #2 sounds like a paranoid schizophrenic/Chuck Barris type. I’m already mad at #4 for being a selfish bastard in a contrived outfit. #5 is less offensive but I can tell he has codependency issues.

Put 'em all in a blender, so to speak, and then I’ll be interested. But from the list, number three comes closest, even if he is a work-aholic. Unless he’s obsessing over that flower. The second he starts talking to it, I’m officially skeeved.

number 2.
“Extremely skillful hands” did it for me.
:wink:

#2 all the way. Dark, intelligent and mysterious is a winning combination. #1 reminded me of He-Man or Conan the Barbarian, #3 doesn’t sound like he radiates self-confidence, #4…just…not my type, and #5 sounds ok, but a bit too mundane.

2 describes the man I love to a t, almost. I choose him with 5 coming in second, then 3 (although I’m not into red hair on guys). 1 and 4 don’t really do it for me.

:confused:

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by jinwicked *
**Number 3, with no interest at all in the others. **[/QUOTE

How you doin’? :rolleyes:

Well, I’d certainly be feeling the attractions of number four, but I hope I’m starting to learn not to go for the bad guys. However, if I had to pick one I might well go for him because none of the other descriptions really did it for me.

#1 just doesn’t sound appealing, I don’t want a guy who takes charge ALL the time. OTOH, #3 sounds too meek, as though he’d never express an opinion at all. From the description I’m not sure I’d feel I could trust #2. #5 sounds the best of the bunch in theory, but the problem I’m really having here is that I don’t really go for guys based on any of the characteristics you described. I appreciate good looks and other favourable aspects (kind, caring, good job, intelligent etc) as much as the next girl, but what really does it for me isn’t something I can describe. I either have a connection with a guy or I don’t, and if I don’t, it’s not happening.

#5 is almost exactly my type, lol

2 wins.
5 loses. The gym stuff and devotion to beliefs are scary.

Guy 1 = dumb blonde. No thanks.

Guy 2 = good looking and intelligent with a laid back personality. Goes after what he wants without being pushy. Not bad.

Guy 3 = wiry, red-headed shy guy. Seems like a pansy.

Guy 4 = umm, no.

Guy 5 = so so. He has some good traits (reasonably attractive, intelligent and passionate), but I could see him getting on my nerves at some point. Must go to the gym, must be a dogmatic freakoid. I’ll pass.

The lucky winner is Guy #2! Where’s the sign up sheet for a guy like that? Can I get a taller model please?

#3. I don’t want no stinkin’ poet, and, as observed by several above, #2 sounds somewhat sociopathic.

Are these some sort of archetypes? #2 sounds like James Bond. Being weak on superhero knowledge. I couldn’t figure out who the others were supposed to be. Who uses a double-headed axe? Is there a Thor superhero?

#5 describes someone I already know almost exactly. So I guess I’m biased.
#5, defintely.

Although, I’d take any of 1-4 if #5 is not available. :wink:

hmmmm which one has a sense of humor?