I’m sure there are plenty of rolls of Kodachrome in cold storage, and I’ll bet you’ll be able to find someone to develop it at specialty stores or photography clubs for quite a while.
At least I’ve still got a Nikon camera … it’s just there’s a CCD to give me the nice bright colors, the greens of summers, and make me think all the world’s a sunny day. Mama, don’t take my CCD away-ye-yay! It even scans right!
Here’sSteve McCurry’s blog post acknowledging the last roll being developed. Kodak gave him the last roll that was produced and it was developed at Dwayne’s. His post includes some of the pictures from that roll.
Yeah, Kodachrome had a great name, and because of Paul Simon it will live on forever in boomer’s memories. But the truth is that CCD/CMOS technology has largely supplanted them for general use, and for a lot of professional use.
I stopped using Kodachrome in 91 when I discovered Velvia, which is vastly superior in resolution and produces better colors, especially for outdoor photography. It remains popular and certainly has more to do with the death of Kodachrome than digital photography…
The first article linked made me a bit sad too, in part that whoever wrote it misspelled loupe twice. Already the common tools are uncommon enough that they a) have to be explained, and b) are unfamiliar enough that nobody said “that doesn’t look right” and left it misspelled.