Now, I know two weeks notice is customary and all that I’d be expected to give. But here’s the sitch:
A) I know I’m going to be leaving at the end of April
B) I’ve worked here for almost 8 years, and all of the staff is very close
C) I want to continue doing some freelance work for this company
D) my job is one that requires a bit of advance planning to assign and execute the workload, and I don’t want to leave them in a lurch to try to find someone to handle my workload (for reasons A and B)
E) I have an annual review today
Now, personally, I would feel uncomfortable going through my whole review mtg., esp. the bits where I say what I’d like to see myself doing over the course of the next year, without revealing that I’m leaving. When I do give notice, I’m going to feel like I duped my boss/co-workers, and if by chance they feel the same way, then it will greatly hurt my odds of getting future freelance work from the company–something that’s pretty certain if I leave on good terms.
BUT … my family and friends (save my wife) are all saying, “Screw them–just give two weeks notice.” Now, true, things change and my new opportunity could fall through in the next 2 months … but it would be a major happening for such a deal to fall apart at this stage, something that is unheard-of in the industry. But …
So, am I stupid to be giving 2 months notice vs. 2 weeks notice? If I hated where I worked, I wouldn’t think about it. But I like my job well enough (not as much as what I’ll soon be doing, obviously), and I love the people here, many of whom mentored me through my early career and are friends. I don’t want to generate ill-will, nor do I want my work suddenly dumped on all of them who remain (which is what will happen).