The “World Trade Center Plane Crash” thread is such a difficult read. Sometimes I go back to it, once in a blue moon, and I’ll probably have a look on September 11 this year. As somebody said above, your heart just pounds the whole way through it. It’s hard to explain.
Good find. If there are others from other years, please post links to them.
Thanks, HardlySanguine for this and other help! If you don’t mind, would you explain the method you used to verify that the thread by Living Dead Girl at 09-11-2001, 08:03 AM is the earliest one dealing with the attacks? I could post your PM to me here, but perhaps you’d like to embellish on it for others’ sakes. That’s some clever searching tools for future reference, in case others (like me) weren’t aware of those tricks.
It’s a shame that some MBs I was on at the time no longer seem to have archives going that far back eg Snopes, Popbitch. They would be a small, but historically interesting, thing to have kept.
The Fark archive still exists. Here’s a link to that week’s archive here:
and how those sequence numbers are the ultimate in time stamps. You can increment or decrement them and get the next post “in time” regardless of the forum or thread the post belongs with. It was by way of that sort of poking around that HardlySanguine confirmed that the Living Dead Girl thread/post was THE EARLIEST here.
I didn’t know these things before HardlySanguine shared them with me. I am still hoping he will share whatever else we should know about those numbers, as compared with thread numbers, forum numbers, user numbers and whatever other numbers we’re awash in.
I have been curious myself ever since reading the Living Dead Girl thread. I just checked and she’s as active as this week! I have no memory of exchanging comments with her so I would feel uneasy addressing her to visit this thread, but if any of you know her better than I, perhaps such a thing might be in order.
All of those people offering to email or place calls for others…in the end, did you? I don’t know why, but I’d like to hear about that. It must have been odd to call a complete stranger, on behalf of another complete stranger, to tell them they were ok, but then again, everything on that day was odd.
Even if no one placed a call or sent an email, the fact that so many people volunteered to do so is pretty amazing.
Yep, here’s the PM I sent if anyone is actually curious:
The system vBulletin uses is quite straightforward - it counts everything chronologically:
/sdmb/showthread.php?t=
/sdmb/showpost.php?p=
/sdmb/member.php?u=
/sdmb/forumdisplay.php?f= (revealing the existence of secret or scrubbed forums [take a look at f=8, for example]
/sdmb/search.php?searchid= (well, this one looks like it’s cleared almost immediately, but if you do a search yourself and turn back the searchid by one or two you can see what someone else just searched for)
I’m also going to link to alterego’s Google Search Tips post which is always great in these situations.
General Questions
Impossible for every plane to land?
09-04-2001, 06:07 PM
Alzarian
=================================
Assuming that HardlySanguine has deduced the sequential nature of the Thread Numbers, and assuming I didn’t miss one on either end of the range, the threads started on 9/11/2001 are in this range:
Thanks for the details on Vix, chorpler, but do you know her well enough to ask her to comment here in this thread? If not, that’s fine. I don’t remember crossing threads with her before, so I would feel awkward PMing her myself. Maybe looking back on that time is not all that comfortable for her.
Memories can be faulty, but I seem to recall a news report, shortly after both towers were hit, that yet another would-be hijacking team was intercepted at the Boston airport before getting on the plane.
It was probably just hysteria – after reports of two or three planes hijacked, it wouldn’t seem all that unlikely that there were one or two more. But AFAIK, it turned out to be a bogus report.
Anyone remember this and have the slightest cite for it?
I remember hearing a rumor, within half an hour of the first plane hitting the WTC, that there had been an explosion at the Supreme Court building in Washington.
I had watched a show on the History Channel some years back about United Airlines Flight 23 from JFK that returned to the gate after flight dispatcher Ed Ballinger sent a warning after the crash into the north tower. Six men initially refused to leave the plane. They eventually disembarked and disappeared into the crowd. Authorities checked their luggage and found copies of the Koran and al-Qeada instruction sheets. This was not officially labeled as a confirmed hijack attempt, however.
According to historycommons.org, there was a total of nine suspected aborted hijackings which may have been averted when the order was given to ground all air traffic. Again, none of these has officially been publicly confirmed as a hijack attempt, so take them with a grain of salt.