Wow, lot’s of good stuff being discussed. Loopydude’s idea on how Woltz’s “infamia” (sp?) may have contributed to how the horse head thing is a nice concept.
It definitely involved the why. The discussion between Tom and Vito about how to handle Woltz’s refusal is covered in the book and in the TV “Saga” version. Woltz’s weakness was the key to Vito’s decision to go all out against Woltz. It’s a shame it wasn’t included in GF1 (as well as Genco’s deathbed scene).
Let’s see now:
- On Fredo. Fredo in the book is not a weakling until the attack on Vito which results in a breakdown. Only in the movie is Fredo shown as previously weak. One of the few significant differences between the book and the movie (other than trimming).
Michael would have killed Fredo immediately upon finding out the betrayal except for their mother still being alive. Fredo knew this and was extremely concerned at their mother’s funeral, fearing for his own life. Michael, the master of hiding his true intent, pretended to make up with Fredo at the funeral. There’s a shot of Michael nodding to Neri at that point: “We’re going to keep him alive for now, but later he goes.” is the understanding.
(Al Neri has a much bigger role in the book and also appears more in the GF2-related segments of the TV “Saga”. His role as Michael’s number 1 guy is frequently overlooked. So Michael relied more on Neri than on Tom.)
Okay, so why did Fredo have to die: that’s the story line of GF2. Michael is basically going downhill. He’s losing it mentally. He’s getting more and more isolated. (That’s why GF2’s “current” story line ends with Michael alone at Tahoe.)
He has forgotten all of his father’s principles and business savy. He orders the hit of Roth for no justifiable business reason, merely for revenge. Fredo was part of Roth’s plot against Michael. He had to go too.
(It all ties back into the beginning of GF2, where Michael had failed to back Clemenza (leading to his death) in order to further his schemes. Loyalty meant nothing to him anymore.)
Keeping Fredo alive for the time being, like with Carlo in GF2, also makes others think that Michael isn’t going to go all out for revenge.
- About Kay. As has been noted. Michael was rebelling against his family during the WWII years. Dating a white-bread protestant girl was the opposite of what his father would have wanted. It was just like him signing up after Pearl Harbor.
The crucial change in Michael that led him to come back to the family was the hit attempts on his father. “I’m with you Pop.”
So marrying a Sicilian girl was entirely in line with this turnabout.
The core question is really: why did he go looking for Kay, esp. since he had been back in the US for several years?
My opinion is that he was starting to tire again of his father’s business and was looking again on getting out. Marrying Kay would be one part of that. Going legit and becoming just a casino owner would be another part.
But it is clear that his whole heart wasn’t really into either of those. He would be unable to avoid his destiny.
(This internal conflict in Michael was apparently supposed to be a major part of GF3, and certain key scenes in it with Michael and Kay arguing over this were ruinied by Keaton’s awful acting. It’s a mystery. Keaton is a good actress, but in GF1 and GF3 she just stunk.
She really shines at the end of the TV “Saga” when she is shown lighting candles during the closing credits. Kay had changed as well. Nice touch.)
[And one of these days, someones going to have to explain to me how Johnny Ola became a Soprano.]