Where were you looking? Because if I go to Start > Help and Support, then type “change password” in the search field, the second item in the “Suggested topics” list is the instructions on how to change your password if your computer is in a workgroup. Is that not the correct set of instructions?
Yes. My problem isn’t the mere existence of the feature; it’s that its default setting is guaranteed to cause more problems than it solves, and it’s sufficiently obscure that it’s easy to imagine many people never figuring it out.
Re: the Ribbon in Office 97…
I don’t hate it as much as I used to, but that’s only because I’ve gotten used to it and know how to deal with it. For anyone who doesn’t know, it’s better left minimized and placed above the Quick Access toolbar, which you can customize to your heart’s content. For me, step 1 of that customization is a bit counter-intuitive: I dumped all the icons for commands for which there is an easily-memorable control+letter combo. For example, where Save was, I placed Save All.
While I hate Word as much or more than anyone here, you, sir, were using the wrong tool for the job. As hard as hell as it is to learn, TeX/LaTex/Lyx are really the only game in town as far as 20+ page documents with cross-references, TOCs, etc. I would never consider Word for that. Just thinking about it makes my blood cold.
And Word is just a piece of shit. The typography is atrocious: you have to dive deep into the bowls of the program just to turn on ligatures, there is no baseline support, margins are impossible to work with - it’s a nightmare, plain and simple.
I just don’t understand how a good option has yet to come along. Following typographic rules is easy from a programming stand-point, while making the document beautiful without anyone really trying. That’s a win-win, so why is LaTex the only game in town for good typography?
Many years ago (like almost 25 years), we used QuarkXpress on Macs. Didn’t bother with a word processing program at all. I couldn’t believe how clumsy MS Word for the Mac was when I finally saw it, and when I hit WordPerfect on an IBM PC of that era, my jaw dropped. No GUI, no WYSIWYG. Printing a document was an adventure, because you never knew what it was going to look like.
How is QuarkXPress regarded these days? Even back then, it was easy to control things like tracking and kerning (want to get rid of that widow? Just dial back the tracking in tiny increments until it snaps back to the preceding line.), to get text flowing around graphics, and so on. Smooth, intuitive, and almost bug-free.
Add Excel’s incessant intuition. I tried graphing something with months in it and Excel insisted on filling in months that aren’t part of the data. Had to force the dates into text. OO just assumes you know what you’re doing. Wouldn’t be so bad if I could turn it off.