It means beyond the mass murderer that’s been caught, there’s another nigh batshit crazy racist spewing the same stuff free to wash impressionable brains with nonsense.
Just as is typical in a Chen cite, his cite does not say what he thinks it says.
Notice that the point here is not the sorry point of Merkel regarding Muslim assimilation is a valid one, the point here is that the writer actually brings that feeble connection to earth in the balance with the uni-bomber manifesto with the purpose to dismiss it.
I don’t agree at all, for the reasons outlined here.
CliffNotes:
You’ve on numerous occasions tried to support your statements with data pulled from a blog written by a PhD student who subscribes to the right-wing conspiracy theory of a secret cabaal of “Cultural Marxists” who imposes the norms of tolerance and multiculturalism on western societies (other supporters of that theory are Breivik and RaleighRally).
When I pointed out (some time ago) that that blogger posted faulty/fraudulent data you didn’t give a shit and kept on using that same source without giving other folks a fair warning.
That indicates lack of intellectual honesty, and a propensity for choosing agenda over transparency and quality control. IOW dishonesty.