I’m going to guess that they thought a frank discussion about race is one step in making things better. I’m going out on a limb here and guess that they didn’t think a frank discussion was all that we needed. I noticed they didn’t say that.
I was going to comment on this, but felt my post was long enough as it was. But, yeah, I cringe every time I hear the term, “black on black crime”. It is used in the black community even more than elsewhere, and it’s stupid, for the reasons that you listed.
Help me think this through, please.
-Is it possible to assess and compare crime rates between various communities?
-Do crime rates within black communities trend higher than within white communities?
-Do these comparisons account for income, education, etc?
-If such comparisons are possible, and if they show higher crime in black communities, does that not say something about the “culture” within those communities?
I’m going to do something that makes me uncomfortable, yet feels right: to discuss my own personal experience with race. I’m a white guy with both Appalachian and Italian-American roots. I have a tiny bit of American Indian in me. Grew up in a small town with virtually no nonwhite people. I married a woman who is half black and half Oriental (don’t bug me for using that word) and we have two obviously mixed-race kids. Man, are they mixed.
I bring this up because I believe, perhaps immodestly, that it gives me far more personal insight into racial issues than most people. It is the ideal toward which all “good Americans” aspire, if not for themselves, then at least for society, right? My family and I are post-racial. We never have “frank discussions” about race. It’s never been necessary. Discussions my wife and I have about race tend to be of the variety of “Your parents cook a type of food that my parents wouldn’t want to stand in the same room with, isn’t that amusing?” If we find it necessary someday to have frank discussions about race, the next stop will be divorce court.
I think that if it can work for us, and it does, then it can work for the country. Calls for “frank discussions” about race carry an underlying assumption that there is a serious problem. And if you believe there’s still a serious problem at this point in history, after all the frank discussions, more frank discussions are just going to make it worse. No, I am against further “frank discussions”. I know the SDMB is all about debate, but I don’t think it is nuts to suggest that there are some situations that are not improved by debating them. It’s time to let it go. I’d go a step further and claim that even if there is a serious problem with race relations, the best way to get the problem to go away is to act as though there isn’t a problem. That is almost never the right approach, but in this case I believe it is.
Reminds me of the movie Bulworth, where the title character - running for political office - says: All we need is a voluntary, free spirited, open-ended program of procreative racial deconstruction. Everybody just gotta keep fuckin’ everybody til they’re all the same color…
The type of people who are interested in FDOR tend to already have opinions about race relations already. As I said previously, the implication that you can actually change anything with this type of discussion is that one or both sides are somewhat ignorant of the issues. Not likely, considering the vast amount of discussion about these matters that goes on already. People can have differing views without lacking in understanding. The question is what you gain from debating things that people feel very strongly about, versus politely leaving them alone and concentrating on more concrete practical matters.
I don’t claim to have made any sort of study of FDOR people. But my experience is that people most eager to talk about racial issues these days tend to have one particular viewpoint. YMMV.
This is an important point. The notion that there is hostility to white folks for stuff their forebears did. Not exactly fair. It would be like blaming japanese teenagers for the batan death march.
However, let me expand upon the anlogy, you didn’t simply punch your neighbor every day, you also took the fruits of his labor every day for centuries and using that wealth, denied opportunities to your neighbor’s son while heaping opportunity on your own.
The hostility towards white folks these days is at least to some extent not the result of their racism but their refusal to acknowledge that their position in society compared to blacks is at least partially attributable to the history of racism. This acknowledgement means trying to make amends, we can’t turn back the clock or even put blacks where they might have been if they came here like the pilgrims (or the Irish for that matter) instead of in chains on slave ships but the acknowledgement of that history as having modern day repercussion would be a pretty good start towards discussing what if anything can or should be done about it.
At this point in the evolution of racism, why do we need to monitor racism ? We don’t monitor discrimination towards short people or ugly people.
We don’t monitor how light skinned black people discriminate against dark skinned black people either.
The obsessive focus on racism was needed in the past and has done miles of service in changing the wide spread attitudes of people who were willing to change. At this point however I fear the exercise of focusing on racial issues is more likely to create resistance and opportunities for recruitment by the racists.
I don’t think you are a racist and I do think that many of the problems in the black community are not the direct results of racism (rap music that denigrates women, glorifies violence and crime) at least not intentional racism (drug laws) but sometimes they are (the enforcement of drug laws). While I will denounce the poisonous rap music, there is plenty of edifying contructive hip hop out there that poses some really pointed questions to society and we can’t simply ignore them and say “well pull yourself up by your bootstraps and THEN we can talk about how much racism has prevented yuo from achieving.”
No. To put it clearly, when you account for the effects of socioeconomic factors on criminal behavior, race does not help you to predict criminal behavior.
Yes, they say clearly that attributing crime to the “culture” of the black community is itself a racist attribution.
I just found that the first issues of the Journal of Race and Social Problems are available online for free. You may find them useful in puzzling through these issues. Please look here: Race and Social Problems | Home
When do you think the Civil rights act and the Voting rights act were passed?
the issue of gay marraige is at least to some degree about… well I don’t know what, I would have thought homophobes would want all homosexuals in committed relationships so they gay people won’t corner them in a bathroom or something. Its going to change and change soon.
I’ve always wondered why there is racism against dark skin everywhere in the world. I Asia which has almost no exposure to blacks, there is racism against dark skin. In Europe, there is racism. In South America, there is racism.
WTF is the deal with that? Is it the connection between dark skin and working in the sun all day? Is it because of something about dark colors thatt make su more afraid?
I don’t know how well it is respected, but one book I found quite interesting in thinking about how I think about race, was Faces at the Bottom of the Well by Derrick Bell. Several thought experiments I found quite enlightening.
I think that shift is starting to occur. I think Michele Obama needs to go into black neighborhoods and talk about the poisonous aspects of the black community.
Well, there’s racism against the Chinese - they’re not dark-skinned. But at least for some parts of Asia, dark skin is associated with working under the sun and by extension, poverty. It’s a class distinction rather than race.
Yeah but there was enough of it for me to know how much it can fuck you up.
Exactly.
[
Exactly.
So you think that Obama in office might make a difference for the black communities perspective of the world? As an Asian it certainly made this country seem a little less hostile to me.
I was with some guys at country club locker room when someone cracked a black joke, I laughed and after they left, a Jewish guy said you really think they aren’t telling those same sort of jokes about Asians when you aren’t around. It dumbfounded me because I had heard those same guys tell anti-semetic jokes when the Jewish guy wasn’t around and it dumbfounded me that I hadn’t put two and two together.
An interesting perspective would be to get the input of white kids who are minorities in their community. I have developed a much greater empathy for the path of minorities watching what my son has gone through at his school. The junior high is majority Asian (Chinese and Korean), and the percentage of Anglo Whites (i.e. not Persian or Hispanic) is below 30% I think.