Let's pit Dopers who engage in debate with Starving Artist

:shrug: If you’re too fucking lazy to pick up a spoon yourself and put it in your own mouth, that isn’t my problem.

Bricker knows what I meant.

See, Airman? Sometimes we do eat our own, especially when they’re being collosal douchebags.

It didn’t. Maybe you just noticed it more.

Idont think anyone will argue that Starving Artist is a shining beacon of truth, intellectual integrity, and intelligence on this board. However, the worst? Naw… not by a far shot. There have been, however, a few to come in to this thread to stake their claim to that title quite admirably.

I do accept that. I accept that about you, and **Bricker **and Oakminster. The difference with **SA **is that he actually is an ignorant troglodyte as he himself says if not in so many words. What do you think it means when he dismisses book learnin’ out of hand? Does he have to spell it out for you word for word for you before you disown the guy, or is no one who is conservatative so voluntarily pig ignorant that you will do so?

Obviously **SA **doesn’t know what the hell I was talking about, but I didn’t bother trying to explain it to him because let’s face it, his answer is going to be that libruls have destroyed America and young people of today are all good for nothing, same as his answer would be if you complained about him stepping on your toe. Why bother?

Had to bring up Hicks, dinja? The one , single, Being who even comes close to being sacred to me.

Hicks. Think how he would lay waste to the dreck that pollutes this board. They would have no mealy-mouth words to answer his Truth. Imagine the cleansing, brilliant, horrifying, hellfire he would ignite here. All these back and forth worthless mother-ass-fisters would drown in their own regurgitated Jesus-jizz-goo and the world would be just a tiny, little, bit more pure; more real. Just that little bit less batshit ass-backwards… because he’d deal his verbal cowboy-boot cockroach crushing to all y’all who need it so very, very much.

’Luce, “R.I.P” doesn’t even begin to do him justice. We needed that guy desperately. But then some prankster Satanic Christian/Islamic God who doesn’t even exist fucked Hick’s pancreas with his huge, scaly, black cock of doom.
If only he were here to set all you fucking petty, cum-guzzling poseurs straight (and you know who you are---- or… maybe you don’t, 'cuz yer just so much less relevant than a cracker-stack of Grade D Soylent Green.

Fuck your space-waste.

But please–return to your regularly scheduled electron-squandering, Cheetos-fueled, girlfriend-lacking, birch-veneered-fluorescent lit, mommy’s damp basement-dwelling wank fest.

I think it means you’re a lying sack of shit.

I’ve been staying out of this thread to give other people a chance to talk. It seems that I’m here all normal discussion stops and it becomes just me against the jerks, but utter bullshit like this I can’t let go. So now, since you are so big on cites and data and proofs and shit, how’s about you cough up a cite of this? Where the fuck did I ever dismiss “book learnin’”? You are aware, are you not, that one of my major complaints about life these days is the sorry state of education in this country? I’ve said as much in this very thread.

Nor, for the record, have I ever said young people of today are good for nothing? Many of them talk and act like like lowlifes, but that’s hardly their fault. Look at the environment they’ve grown up in.

The lies in this thread just keep comin’!

What’s obvious is that neither of you two dolts knew what I was talking about, despite my having mentioned it myself numerous times. I was talking about that well-known liberal propensity for referring to themselves as being more ‘enlighted’ and more ‘evolved’ than everyone else. I don’t typically couch my arguments in obscure references to things preceeding the current discussion by a several hundred years. You gave me a good chance to go off on yet another annoying liberal trait and so I ran with it.

http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=11107005&postcount=101

The Enlightenment is an obscure reference? Perhaps if you don’t go in for that fancy book learnin’ it is.

Yeah, who am I going to believe Prichester, your cite,or my own unvarnished experience? Therefore I’m going to ignore your cite, or better yet, I’ll say it was a joke. Ya, that’s it, a joke, a funny.

It’s like the time I went down to Shelbyville to buy some onions for my belt, because that was the fashion in those days. Onions cost a nickle each. We used to call a nickle a bee then Give me five bees for a quarter we’d say. Of course, we could only get red onions in those days…

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

This rant brought to you entirely by Starving Artist’s Chip On His Shoulder.

We here at Wavy Gravy’s Home for the Chronically Groovy would like to emphasize that even though SA is a certifiable “old fart”, he does not necessarily speak for the old fart community, and his views should not be interpreted as typical of old farts as a class. Perhaps “certifiable” is not precisely the word. Then again, perhaps it is.

Thank you. Nurse? Nurse?

Dude. Your entire schtick–the biggest, strongest plank in your platform–is anti-“book learning.” Whenever anyone offers you documented proof of something, you dismiss it if you don’t agree with it. That’s medieval thinking. That’s “if the waters accept her that is proof she’s not a witch” thinking.

If you see evidence you agree with, you accept it. If you see evidence that’s contrary to what you’ve concluded from your own necessarily limited experience, rather than reconsider those conclusions, which is what sane people do, you deny the reality.

That’s why I said you “refuse to learn” 8 or 10 pages ago, which you characteristically reinterpreted to mean “blindly accept whatever the left feeds you.” Which is bullshit, as you knew when you typed it. You refuse to learn in that you refuse to take in any information that doesn’t support your illogical presumptions about a world of which your experience is not total: there is experience beyond your line of sight.

How do you know we landed on the moon? You didn’t see it, you weren’t there. Have you ever been to Egypt? How do you know the pyramids aren’t some Hollywood tabletop model? You’re willing to accept information beyond your horizon if it doesn’t require actual thought; actual learning.

It’s only a good thing you learned the earth goes around the sun early in your life, before you decided to use only your eyes, and not your brain, to understand the world around you.

Oh come now, we’re far more enlightened than that today. The practice of drowning innocent people to determine witchery is barbaric and medieval. Everyone knows that you can simply use a precision electronic balance to determine if the potential witch weighs as much as a duck. We’ve even got an SI-standard calibrated duck mass now to make the whole process very scientific. You can tell how accurate it is by how many decimal points the readout has. That’s real progress.

OK, let’s work this through. lissener, pick a fact for which there is documented proof and that you allege Starving Artist refuses to accept. Let’s see this accusation play out, live and in color.

I propose “Starving Artist is a dick”, which is proven to many of use but which he finds incomprehensible.

Yes, thank you for that excellent effort.:rolleyes:

It’s a pit thread, you moron. Lighten up.

I always wondered why we don’t simply burn ducks and cut out the middleman. Er, -woman.

Read the thread. SA has provided his own examples.