New year, full of possibility, including lots of possible suck.
I think I’ll start a Political Action Committee.
FEC guidelines available here:
I don’t think I’ll call it DoperPAC, but I see how one could.
What would a DoperPAC look like?
New year, full of possibility, including lots of possible suck.
I think I’ll start a Political Action Committee.
FEC guidelines available here:
I don’t think I’ll call it DoperPAC, but I see how one could.
What would a DoperPAC look like?
It would raise money for the wonkiest candidates for Congress. The 2 incumbent front runners would be rocket scientist Rush Holt and oddly enough former satirist Senator Al Franken.
Oh, and we’d need to rebrand. CecilPAC would work.
No, call it StraightDPAC. Get some conservative dollars.
The wonkiest candidates of the left, I imagine. I can’t see much money going from a Doper PAC to a right-wing candidate, wonky or not.
Not happening. This place has way too many liberal wackadoodles.
Donors don’t have to know that, do they? And if they ever find out . . . Ignorance fought!
Candidates?! I thought this was gonna be an issues PAC. The top issue on the agenda is pot-decrim, and the second issue . . . puff . . . eh, we’ll think of one.
[QUOTE=BrainGlutton]
No, call it StraightDPAC. Get some conservative dollars.
[/QUOTE]
I don’t think conservatives would go for it, not when someone pointed out to them what ‘DP’ stands for. Even if we are talking Straight DP I’m guessing conservative types my shy away.
-XT
Considering how long it took them to figure out “tea bagger”, I wouldn’t worry too much about DP.
Aren’t generational-cultural differences amazing?