Liberal with a gun

I’m an unabashed liberal, and I’ve got a gun. Two, in fact. And one of them is a real prize.

‘Twasn’t always thus. I grew up and have lived most of my life in a weaponless family and friends milieu where gun ownership was not only nonexistent but often held in contempt. I continue to regard parts of the American gun world with dismay.

And yet, here I am today, owner of two pistols and member of the local fish and game club.

What brought this on? In essence, intimations of mortality. Timor mortis conturbit me.

I got to shoot a handgun way back in the mid-1980’s, enjoyed the experience, but for a number of reasons never pursued it then. Over the years I’d occasionally toyed with maybe taking up shooting, then put the idle thought aside – some day, maybe… And there were all those, for me, unpalatable aspects of the American gun culture – did I really want to wade into that world?

The cardiac scare I had in late April of this year reminded me that I am not, in fact, immortal; that I am going to die, not somewhere way off in the dim future, but relatively soon. My father died in the recovery room following open-heart surgery in his early 60s. I am a couple of months away from 63, with a much healthier heart, but still… I don’t have all that much time left to waste, that much future to put things off to. Dammit, I’m running out of somedays. Ever since spring, I’ve been thinking off and on about dying – me, myself, DYING. Not obsessing, not fretting, but with a newfound awareness of the sands running out. If I’m going to do stuff, I better do it NOW.

There’s another issue, as well – I’ve been rolling along in a comfortable but narrow rut for quite some time: Working at home, doing some photography, taking care of the horses, seeing a few long-time friends, but otherwise not venturing outside of my snug little lair very often. I need to shake things up. To push my envelope. To get out of the rut, out of my comfort zone. And boy, this is one helluva way to roar past all that, innit? It was an odd feeling, to sit through the multi-hour gun safety course required for a Class A license (yup, I went all the way for concealed carry – same cost, same process as a more limited license), chatting with people who probably despise much of what I hold politically dear; to walk into that gun shop for the first time – me, the bleeding-heart liberal, the Obama-lover – and become absorbed in picking out just the right lethal weapon for me. (The guys at the shop couldn’t have been nicer to a self-confessed newbie, by the way.)

I’ve been granted membership in the local fish and game club, giving me range privileges so I can shoot my new toys. I plan to lie low as far as political discussions at the club go – envelope-pushing will go only so far – and simply enjoy developing a new skill, making new friends. I didn’t get a gun for self-defense; my town recently had its first murder in over 20 years, of a restaurant owner who made a habit of counting his money on the bar in front of his patrons. It’s target shooting I want to do, and have been doing over the last couple of months. And ya know what? It’s fun! It’s absorbing. When I shoot, it’s my whole focus, and everything else goes away. And the guys at the range have been sweethearts about helping a newbie, even a frumpy old woman newbie.

It still feels odd to be doing this. Still gives me at times a “Who are you, and what have you done with Laura?” feeling.
I think that’s a good thing.

Ahhhhhhhhhh… By now, anyone who’s (a) read this far, and (b) interested in what guns I bought will no doubt be hollering at the screen: “So what did you get anyway? What’s the real prize already? Give!” All righty, then.

First gun, what I picked out on my initial trip to the gun shop, with much helpful advice: A .22 caliber Ruger Mark III 22/45. It fits my hand well, has an easy trigger pull (a necessary consideration given the arthritis in my dominant hand), not much recoil, eats any ammo you care to feed it without jamming, and shoots with encouraging accuracy even in the wobbly hands of a newbie. I put 200 rounds through it the first time I shot it, and had a blast. Very tired hand and wrist by the end, but definitely a good time.

And the second handgun? Why get a second one when the first one suits me just fine? Why take a further step on the road toward gun nut damnation? Why, when on an ammo-buying trip I spotted it on the bottom shelf of a far-corner display case, did I succumb to temptation and (after researching it online; I’m not entirely bereft of my senses) did I pay twice what the Ruger cost me to own it?

Because it isn’t a new gun; it’s an old and very handsome Colt Woodsman Match Target.22 pistol. Its serial number (MT 23XX) indicates it’s from the first year of manufacture of the First Series Woodsman (the “Bullseye” model), which was made between 1938 and 1944. It came without the original box but with the original four-sheet manual. From what I’ve read online about it, it’s a finely crafted, very good target pistol. Well, okay, I’ve discovered it’s fussy about what it eats, but feed it the right ammo and it shoots beautifully. Looks mighty fine doing it too. Fits my hand even better than the Ruger.

And this particular pistol is extra-special in two ways: It has the original walnut “elephant ear” grips, which are valuable by themselves, plus a previous (its first?) owner had it engraved, making it one of a kind. The engraving included the person’s initials, which perhaps is why, even though it’s in fine shooting shape, it was mine for a price well under others I found online for the same make and model. I guess collectors want stuff that looks fresh from the factory, but not me. To the contrary; the engraving tells me that “SAG” cared a lot for this pistol, and I feel a kind of kinship with that person in our appreciation of a finely crafted implement. This gun will be spending its time at the range, not in a display case.

If you’d told me a year ago I’d be writing this, I would have collapsed in giggles. And yet, here I am. Life is strange.

Cross-posted at my blog.

Good for you! I own a Woodsman and love it, although mine was made about 60 years after yours.

One of us, one of us.

Welcome to the hobby EddyTeddyFredde, from a fellow gun-totin’ Liberal.
If you want a forum where you can talk about guns and stuff without getting death threats for liking, or at least not hating, Obama, stop by the Liberal Gun Club forum
There are some people on there who are way to the left of most Dopers, but they are, by and large, very tolerant and welcoming over there. You might like it.
I’m Bumbazine over there too, BTW.

The Colt forum isn’t too bad a place either, if you stay out of the political areas.

Congrats on finding a wonderful old Colt. They are truly fine pieces and have a lot more character than newer pistols, though the Ruger is a fine piece also.

I myself just acquired a Colt Police Positive .22 revolver manufactured in 1910. It was re-blued and re-barreled some time after 1925, so is purely a shooter and not a collectible, but that’s what I bought it for, to shoot.

Next thing you know, you’ll be looking for a .45. :smiley:

Enjoy!

I think there are a lot of gun-toting liberals in America (much more than in any other first-world country). I grew up with a hunter for a dad, and I have a healthy respect for guns and the people who own them (as long as they’re not crazy or hurting people wilfully). You go, guy!

:smiley: I just knew someone would post that.

Thanks for the links, Bumbazine; it’s hard to find people to chatter with about my new hobby. My younger brother, for instance, is quietly horrified. So is my sister, although her wingnut boyfriend is thrilled I’ve gone all Second Amendment. “You need to get more firepower than that wimpy .22! It won’t stop someone in a heavy winter jacket! You oughtta get…” “Um, Art, I’m not worried about self-defense, I just wanna target-shoot…” “Look at this baby of mine! It’ll stop a charging RINO! You oughtta get one of these!” Yeh, right; I shot my instructor’s .45 exactly three times and decided that kind of kick is no kick for me. :smiley:

Meanwhile, I’m :smack: myself over misspelling “conturbat”. :o

Boy did I misconstrue this thread title. :slight_smile:

A .22 is a great choice for target shooting. Ammo is cheap, so you can shoot it a lot, and as you noted, it’s easy on the ears and hands. You don’t need a rhino-stopper to have fun. If you do decide to get a self defense weapon, a .38 or 9mm is plenty firepower for you.

Good for you! I’m (fairly, mostly) tree-hugger liberal but a brief stint in the Navy Reserves and a (past) boyfriend who collected - and shot - collectible, exotic submachine guns made me realise that shooting the crap out of stuff is really a blast. My entire family are sorts that think that anyone who is interested in shooting or owns a firearm is one step away from mowing people down in a shopping mall for fun; they regard all gun owners as violent, insane, uncivilized [del] Tea Partiers [/del] people.

I’ve been toying with the idea of taking classes and getting my CCW, nonetheless. I have little experience with handguns…but I’ve really enjoyed the shooting I’ve done thus far in my life, and it would be fun to get better at it.

Did you buy your first gun, the .22 cal Ruger, from a shop that also had a range, and let you try out different firearms? How did you decide which to get?

I’ve been nearly kicked out of a range for “bringing a full auto”.

I own a Marlin Glenfield Model 60. You can get them on sale for under $100. I got lucky on mine. $109 at Sportmart 11 years ago. $20 off. Marked down in the back, took it up to the register, they rang up an additional $20 off there. $69 plus tax. :smiley:

I use two fingers to flutter the trigger, since I can’t go that fast one at a time. Empties the 14 round tubular magazine like nothing.

My sister (who greatly surprised me by telling me she’d bought a gun) bought a Taurus 9 shot .22 revolver. I always love the idea behind that. “Did I shoot five or six? Do you feel lucky, punk? Well actually I did shoot 6. I have another three. Go for it.”

After I got my license, I took a live fire class with the same guy who’d taught the mandatory (for Massachusetts) gun safety course. (It was an excellent course, by the way; I learned a lot, including how much more there is to learn.) He brought three handguns for me to try. Three shots with his .45 made it plain something lighter was what I needed. He had a .22 revolver, which had the right level of recoil and trigger pull (when I manually cocked it first) for me, plus the ease of loading a wheel gun made it attractive. His revolver, though, was too big for my hand and barrel-heavy (the guy’s a frikkin bear).

I zipped over to the gun shop determined to find a .22 revolver that fit me. They didn’t have what I needed, but I confessed my newbiehood and they took plenty of time helping me through the selection process and recommended the Ruger as a good beginner’s pistol. No range to try firing it, but I liked how it fit my hand, I liked how easy it was to squeeze the trigger, I liked its plain sleek looks, and I liked the price. So I wound up with a semi-auto, and it’s turned out to be a good choice.

I’d definitely recommend taking the course and taking the plunge into ownership, and the Ruger is a good place to start. As Oakminster said, the ammo is way cheaper than for other calibers, and the Mark III is a good target pistol. Only caveat is the Ruger’s a brute to take apart for cleaning; even my instructor had a vicious struggle to break it down and put it back together when we did a training session with it.

Now I have a boresnakeand cleaning is a lot easier. :smiley:

Liberal or conservative, firearms are a lot of fun. Ruger pistols are always a good choice, I own four myself.

Buckmarks and Woodsmen also good, but there seem to be a lot more aftermarket parts available for the Rugers if you decide to make some improvements later on.

Enjoy.

Since the range is outdoors and New England winters can be a bit chilly, I will probably be putting off the immediate enjoyment for a while.

I thought about replacing the Ruger grips with wood, but in the model I have they’re integral to the frame, so can’t do that.