Kinky.
Hmmm, interesting;
So one of the following must be true:[ul]
[li]The Church in question is not actually being destroyed.[/li][li]The Church in question is not built on the rock.[/li][li]Homosexuals and Liberals did not walk out of the gates of Hades.[/li][li]The quoted passage is untrue.[/ul][/li]
Or did I miss one?
I think the Pope should allow priests to have sex with each other. THey can get rid of their homosexual urges with each other and not small boys.
Err doesn’t the catholic church say homosexuality is bad… so umm why do we have homosexual pedophilic priests? (try saying that 3 times fast)
Sorry my friend, I hope I’ve been wooshed here. Repressed homosexual urges does not lead to abusing young boys. Paedophilia leads to abusing young boys (and girls, for that matter).
CRorex, one assumes from your total lack of grasp of what anyone with a knowledge of human sexual psychology has had to say about the incident that you are 100% heterosexual in your orientation and unwilling to read in any depth on the subject.
However, let me make the situation clear to you by a probably-offensive remark: How many girls under the age of 12 have you lusted after in the last 24 hours?
If, as I expect, you find that remark offensive, then contemplate the idea that the men on this board who find mutually-desired sexual relations with other men (not little boys) – and the women who do likewise with other women – find your classification of them as pedophiles as hateful as you no doubt found my intentionally-offensive remark above.
Priests are, according to the Roman Catholic Church, supposed to remain celibate, having sex only with Rosie Palm and her five daughters if they cannot refrain from that as well. A significant percentage of them are apparently of gay orientation, meaning what they desire and abstain from is sex with other men. Another significant percentage are straight, meaning that they desire but abstain from sex with women. About 0.5% of them, by the most recent estimates, are pedophiles, meaning that they are turned on by little boys. It is these who are at issue.
Problems with pesky homosexuals and Democrats? You need new Gay-away[sub]TM[/sub].
Just apply Gay-away once a month to keep Homos out for good.
Now available in anti-minority and anti-immigrant strength.
Warning: May cause close-mindednes, bigotry or hypocricy. Churches in the San Fransisco area may require additional treatments. Not safe for pets or children. Do not eat. No gays or liberals were harmed in the making of this post.
This is given a job whose description is best fit by:
“Spend a lot of time around men and work daily with small boys.”
Hmm, I wonder if their recruitment strategy may need changing. . . . LOL
Seriously though, it is like the entire thing is aimed towards gays. Hell reminds me of those sex colonies* proposed in Stranger in a Strange Land. . . .
*Yah yah so they weren’t TECHNICALLY sex colonies, but that is about what they ended up amounting too. . …
"Working on a Sex Farm!!!"
And besides which Princhester’s 42nd postulate (which I just made up) says: The odds of a church leader being charged and found guilty of child molesting are directly proportionate to the extent to which that church leader is in favour of sexual repression.
LOL you took me seriously 
Polycarp, I REALLY hope you understand that I, almost every other post in this thread are being sarcastic.
See, Catholic church = anti-gay.
Catholic church has priests who have molested boys = gay priests
Fiddling with the equations you get…
Catholic church = anti-gay = gay priests.
Oh yeah, I’m still not being serious.
Just thought I should point that out
Oh yeah, and I forgot…
You make sweet LOVIN’ to the person you love, not have sex with.
And we all love ourselves, so wouldn’t the Priests be making sweet lovin’ with Ms Palm and her sisters?
Or wasn’t this what nuns were for?
CRorex, for the record, you need to be aware that sarcasm does not translate well into text. If you need three posts in a row to explain yourself, maybe you should just stop trying to be funny.
Munch,
Yeah the second post was an accident, I forgot to include that in the one above it. The 3rd one was an after thought, but seriously how can you love god if you aren’t willing to Looooooove yourself
I don’t really have much to say on this subject, but the thread title, “Liberals and homos are destroying my church”, keeps giving me the mental image of a drag queen sitting next to a pony-tailed lawyer and saying “Isn’t this bulldozer just fabulous, honey?”
My eyes! They BURN! THEY BURN!
(Were you at that Dopefest? I’ve got pictures somewhere…)
Esprix
What’s with this PONY TAILED LAWYER bullshit?
There is a path to salvation for the North American branch of the Church of Rome. The quick and simple answer is to turn the management of the affairs of the church to the ladies of the Rosary Society. No back sliding when the nun-want-to-be ladies take over. Of course, we’ll have to collapse the tunnel from the convent to the rectory, or maybe shore it up.
Well I have to thank you all for giving me a little something to laugh about. Ordinarily I wouldn’t think that this is the sort of subject one should laugh about, but I’ve been gritting my teeth in rage over the subject (not actually about gay bashing but about the Bishop/coverup scandals) all day and it is a relief to see a little levity.
Lucky you, elucidator–I’m still “Driving a tractor on the Drug Farm!” 
clears throat
“OHHHHHHHH… I’VE BEEN WORKING ON THE SEX FARM, ALL THE LIVE LONG DAY!
i’VE BEEN BOINKING EVERYTHING THAT DIDN’T GET AWAY!”