So I don’t know if y’all have the ability to see if people are linking to the page, but if you can, and you see that badges are being earned for sharing, don’t merge the threads. I mean, we could have handled a week with 3 Limbaugh threads, to be honest. If one thinks that the IMHO thread is Pitty, then do some moderation.
Leaving aside the moderation discussion (which is more ATMB that Site Feedback), it is unfortunate that a merge strands an external link. I wonder if Discourse has some method to place a forward redirect?
Note that the stub topic has several links in it directing the user to the correct location.
The topmost link (also a merged stub) similarly links to the topic. A sufficiently motivated user should be able to find their way to the destination topic, the final merge destination for these 2 other topics.
You bring up an interesting point though. Perhaps if there are zero posts in the topic, and it is closed, we could auto-redirect the user to the topic in the last moderator action
I mean, kinda? To someone unfamiliar with the SDMB, how would they know which of the links to press, other than context? Also, should I identify which of my friends and family are ‘sufficiently motivated’ before promoting the SDMB?
I hear ya. I do think a motivated user would scroll to the bottom, see the “SPLIT THIS TOPIC” notice and click the destination link… but the argument for auto-redirecting to the target is a strong one!
Yes, but I’m promoting my post within the thread, not the thread itself. Going to the top of a 300-post thread isn’t going to get even the ‘motivated reader’ to scroll through all that to find the message I’m promoting.