[QUOTE=Crotalus]
Thanks for answering my question. You actually can’t comprehend that he hasn’t done what you are so upset about. I hope you enjoy your hissy fit.
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Eleusis]
Right there.
[/QUOTE]
Are you always this stupid? Loach said:
[QUOTE=Loach]
You don’t like the windshield statute? Write your state senator. Like I said I don’t think it’s that important and have never pulled someone over for it. Maybe I said it in some secret post only you can read.
Seriously, when 20 posters respond to your OP and every single one seems to think you’re off your rocker, maybe you need to step back and think about where your viewpoint is coming from.
Remember what was said earlier about your seeming inability to read for comprehension? This is Exhibit A. Here’s the WHOLE quote:
In other words, he never did it. It’s a hypothetical. What’s not hypothetical is your inability to read for comprehension. Hopefully this will begin to remedy that problem.
That was so obviously a hypothetical, I’m bewildered as to how you could not see it. It was also an excellent hypothetical, displaying perfectly a course of action that even I - no fan of the police in general - would not argue with.
Tell us, under what circumstances would you believe that a pat-down during a traffic stop is justified? Are there any?
And out of idle curiousity, given some of your side-comments, did you happen to get busted for pot yesterday?
[QUOTE=Cheesesteak]
Seriously, when 20 posters respond to your OP and every single one seems to think you’re off your rocker, maybe you need to step back and think about where your viewpoint is coming from.
[/QUOTE]
Or to quote Bricker without actually looking up the old post:
[QUOTE=Bricker]
When 20 people tell you you’re drunk, lie down.
[/QUOTE]
I’m back. She’s eating something before we go to the doctor.
Ok see that " thing there? I put that there (and it’s brother further down the post) to indicate a hypothetical police report by some hypothetical officer to illustrate what Terry actually means. Again I’ll say I have never pulled over anyone for a cracked windshield. I used that as an example because some fucking idiot used it first. I think I’ll start writing those tickets just to piss you off.
[QUOTE=Frank]
That was so obviously a hypothetical, I’m bewildered as to how you could not see it. It was also an excellent hypothetical, displaying perfectly a course of action that even I - no fan of the police in general - would not argue with.
Tell us, under what circumstances would you believe that a pat-down during a traffic stop is justified? Are there any?
And out of idle curiousity, given some of your side-comments, did you happen to get busted for pot yesterday?
[/QUOTE]
Of course it was obviously hypothetical. RT 66 goes east-west, not north-south. And it was a red Corvair not a blue Pinto.
Link please to the actual post where he was bragging.
Loach: This looks like a very good pitting for you. Always good to be pitted by someone who is irrational and foaming at the mouth.
BTW: I have a cracked windshield, is that really grounds to be pulled over? It is on the passenger side.
[QUOTE=Loach]
I’m back. She’s eating something before we go to the doctor.
Ok see that " thing there? I put that there (and it’s brother further down the post) to indicate a hypothetical police report by some hypothetical officer to illustrate what Terry actually means. Again I’ll say I have never pulled over anyone for a cracked windshield. I used that as an example because some fucking idiot used it first. I think I’ll start writing those tickets just to piss you off.
[/QUOTE]
Ha! So you’re even a bigger asshole than I thought.