I should know this exactly why?
::Opens Eleusis on Search and Seizure. Discovers it’s a stash book. Replaces baggie. Reopens stash book; pockets baggie for later::
I should know this exactly why?
::Opens Eleusis on Search and Seizure. Discovers it’s a stash book. Replaces baggie. Reopens stash book; pockets baggie for later::
I BELONG TO THE GREAT HYPOTHETICAL NATION, DICK.
I assume you’re a prosecuter then.
Fuck you too, and include yourself in the pitting, asshole.
Thanks for answering my question. You actually can’t comprehend that he hasn’t done what you are so upset about. I hope you enjoy your hissy fit.
He hasn’t?
He was bragging about it an hour ago…
Where?
Right there.
What a bullshit pitting. You’re making a fool of yourself Eleusis
I’m generally on the side of the people who pit cops for being over zealous etc. but this is just shite of the highest order. Get a fucking grip.
Are you always this stupid? Loach said:
Seriously, when 20 posters respond to your OP and every single one seems to think you’re off your rocker, maybe you need to step back and think about where your viewpoint is coming from.
Remember what was said earlier about your seeming inability to read for comprehension? This is Exhibit A. Here’s the WHOLE quote:
In other words, he never did it. It’s a hypothetical. What’s not hypothetical is your inability to read for comprehension. Hopefully this will begin to remedy that problem.
That was so obviously a hypothetical, I’m bewildered as to how you could not see it. It was also an excellent hypothetical, displaying perfectly a course of action that even I - no fan of the police in general - would not argue with.
Tell us, under what circumstances would you believe that a pat-down during a traffic stop is justified? Are there any?
And out of idle curiousity, given some of your side-comments, did you happen to get busted for pot yesterday?
Or to quote Bricker without actually looking up the old post:
I’m back. She’s eating something before we go to the doctor.
Ok see that " thing there? I put that there (and it’s brother further down the post) to indicate a hypothetical police report by some hypothetical officer to illustrate what Terry actually means. Again I’ll say I have never pulled over anyone for a cracked windshield. I used that as an example because some fucking idiot used it first. I think I’ll start writing those tickets just to piss you off.
Oh great, you have Clothahump agreeing with me. I will never forgive you for this. Never!
Of course it was obviously hypothetical. RT 66 goes east-west, not north-south. And it was a red Corvair not a blue Pinto.
A combative fugitive should be subjected to such.
No, I never have. No thanks to Loach.
The only dealings I’ve had with cops in the last eight years have been road blocks, and the good cops have let me through.
Thank god Loach wasn’t there, my asshole is still intact.
But thanks for asking.
Link please to the actual post where he was bragging.
Loach: This looks like a very good pitting for you. Always good to be pitted by someone who is irrational and foaming at the mouth.
BTW: I have a cracked windshield, is that really grounds to be pulled over? It is on the passenger side.
Jim
Now THAT is funny!
Ha! So you’re even a bigger asshole than I thought.
A liar to boot.
Good on you.