See that “ridge” that defines the outer edge of the breast? Yea…real breasts don’t have that.
A talented Disney star who makes the transition to serious actress instead of leather-faced, bar slut.
I don’t see the ridge, Ithink bad constrst is doing things in that picture.
But on that site it says there is no gap between breasts when a woman is standing up - what the hell are they talking about? Are they saying cleavage is just naturally there?
You’re either making excuses or you’re not familiar with natural human female breasts.
The contrast of the picture has absolutely nothing to do with the well defined ) ( shape on the landscape of her chest.
I don’t quite see the fascination. She’s a relatively attractive young woman who, like many before her, seems compelled to take the slutty route out of child stardom (“Look, I’m nekkid so I must be an adult!” ) More’s the pity as she seems decent enough and might even have some talent, not that I know of any proof for that theory.
Ann Margaret was much hotter in the original pose.
Oh, that ridge. To me it just looks like she has fairly wide set breasts that being pushed together by her shirt (and possibly a bra).
I get the impression you decided before you ever saw that picture Cisco. I’ver seen plenty of female breasts and it is not obvious hers are fake from that pic. Actually, during her SNL appearance I thought they looked pretty natural.
They look kind of fake in the pic, but if they are, she must’ve had them removed since then. I also noticed during her SNL appearance, that they were jiggly, and thought, she’s way too young, and not busty enough for that to happen. But if she had implants, then had them removed, that may have caused them to be not so firm.
One may play “spot the scar tissue” here
She’s nice, but not that special.
I think the Anti-Lindsay backlash officially started this month with a Tom Junod column in Esquire, deriding her as an “oven stuffer” (i.e. a woman whose physical appeal is based on elements that simply don’t exist in nature, like those farm-raised turkeys and chickens whose breast meat is so hormonally pumped up that they’d be unable to reproduce in any natural way).
She’s very attractive. The thing I find most appealing about her is that she endowed her character in Mean Girls with a lot of intelligence, none of which is in evidence in all the stories about her nightclubbing, her dad, and her involvement with Wilmer Valderrama. She’s this year’s Britney, and the year is almost over.
I’m surprised no one has mentioned her nipple exposure that occured a while back. If you don’t know what I talking about, Google on: lindsey lohan nipple
e3
If you google that phrase and look at the second link (caution: nudity), the breast is in good sight and looks very unnatural.
She’s a cute kid, not what I’d call a potential Oscar winner but definitely not a bad actress. I liked her in The Parent Trap and Mean Girls.
I give her 5 years, tops, before she strips for Playboy. It’s a shame that decent actresses still have to slut themselves up to get any press. What a disappointment. What is it with these child stars growing up to have no sense?
My objection to Lohan is that she COULD be a Jodie Foster but she is turning into a Tara Reid.
Bite thy tongue.
Jodie is not only a kickass actress, she’s brilliant AND has class to boot. Lohan couldn’t measure up in a million years.
Danica McKellar, OTOH, could be another Jodie if she got a decent part.
PS: Occam’s Razor, people. Which is more likely? Lohan just “happened” to be blessed with PERFECT boobs, which just “happens” to come in handy for her since she’s an actress, or they’re fake?
Yes. OK! It is a stretch to say she could be the next Jodie Foster.
Perhaps this is more to your liking:
[correction]
My objection to Lohan is that she COULD follow the path of Jodie Foster but instead she is following the Tara Reid ** skanky road to washout hell**.
[/correction]
Fair enough? 
LOL!
Yeah, better 
By that logic there are girls all over this country in colleges and high schools that are completely fake.
Plastic surgery is everywhere but not that everywhere.
Who are the top-tier actresses these days? I’d say Gwyneth Paltrow, Kate Hudson, Anna Paquin, Natalie Portman, Alyson Hannigan, Sarah Michelle Gellar and Kirsten Dunst are on top of the heap, were part of the same child star machine as Lindsay, and don’t seem any worse for wear. Maybe it’s just her.
Dude, you don’t even need the disclaimer. Damn, she’s hot. I honestly can’t see how anyone – male, female, straight, gay, blind (okay, blind, sure) – could look at that cover and not do a double-take with an accompanying “hominahominahomina.”
My conversation with my (straight) friend Alex:
Me: “Did you see the cover of the latest Entertainment Weekly?”
Alex: “No! What’s on it?”
Me: “You mean, what’s on it now?”
So does that mean Lindsay gets a toaster oven?