In my mind the distinction between teaching the Bible vs. about the Bible is this.
The Bible is compromised of 66 different books with about 40 different authors. Although the overall theme of the Bible is the gospel. Each individual book was written by an author who had a specific reason for writing it. He intended that his readers understand something specific.
So I believe that when the Bible is read/studied the first goal is to understand it FIRST within the context for which it was intended & then extrapolate the lessons or implications for us today. That is what I mean by teaching the Bible.
What I mean by teaching about the Bible is when the original context is ignored and the Bible is twisted to say and mean things that was never the original intent. Very dangerous approach. Results in some weird, strange, off the wall beliefs and practices.
I second the city-data rec. Also, Merced is not so big that, with a little narrowing down of what you are seeking, you couldn’t visit most of what is on offer fairly quickly.
And you also might give Beliefnet’s Belief-O-Matic a whirl. It’s a serious questionnaire that evaluates what organized belief systems are closest to your own. Told me I was closest to a Quaker (pretty accurate even though I’m Catholic). It might help you narrow down your candidates.
holamerced: I read your “teach the Bible, not about the Bible” as meaning the exact opposite of your definition further on. If you mean a non-fundamentalist understanding, there doesn’t seem to be a UCC near. A mainline church is more likely - Presbyterian, Episcopal, Methodist - than an independant non-denominational or “Bible” church. But you won’t know until you visit them.