I started an analysis of Snickers the other day, but don’t seem to have gotten very far - I’ve covered Day 2 and some of Day 3, but I need to rereview the latter. However, I’m going to put the first part out now.
I’m looking at Snickers because she claims to be Arwen, and I suspect that may be a cover role. Let’s face it; canonically, if there is anyone who can claim to be “close to Aragorn” it’s Arwen. They’ve been engaged for many years (they met in 2952, I think - Aragorn was 21 then, and had just learned his lineage. The war of the Ring was fought in 3018 - 3019.) So, why was Eowyn - the unsuccessful suitor for his affections - told she was “close to” Aragorn, and not Arwen? It makes her worth a look.
Snickers subbed in for LittlePlasticNinja, so I started by reviewing LPN. I know Snickers can’t answer for what she said, but the two players are taking the same role so there might be some indications there.
LPN made six posts, only one of which had substantive game content, and that was [post=12795605]post 280[/post]. She participates in the handshaking by saying that her PM had “Sauron” in it three times, which is consistent with the vanilla PM. She also challenges the validity of the tactic (correctly, as it turns out.)
Conclusion: not much there, but (such as it is) suggests that she either had a vanilla role, or that (if one of SAHM) she had access to the vanilla role PM.
Snickers subbed in Overnight, and her first substantive post is [post=12831285]1397[/post]. She puts some pressure on Pleo, suggesting that Telcontar the Doc might have protected Pleo N1; she bases this off [post=12818039]post 1115[/post]. This pinged me a bit, because Telcontar was reacting to the impending lynch of Suburban Plankton. Snickers catches this error herself, correcting it in her next post ([post=12833126]1431[/post]). This post also throws out a lot of accusations. For the most part, they’re just questions and comments; for example, she suggests Gadarene didn’t let us forget he’d been the one to pick holes in SP’s roleclaim, suggests that SP was calling Chronos out and planning to hide behind “SAHM wouldn’t do that,” suggests that four players placed “me too” votes for SP, riding on Gadarene’s analysis (although accepting that the analysis was “masterful,”) and then calls Chipacabra out. Gadarene obviously felt smudged, because he defended himself from the comment; Snickers replied that it was “just a comment" in [post=12834305]post 1537[/post].
This last post pinged me a bit for another reason; Snickers said that she was “not bussing" Gadarene. Around here, when we talk about someone “bussing” another, we generally mean the first person is a Mafiate making a case against another Mafiate. Townies generally talk about “bandwagoning” someone. Now, we know that Gadarene was Town-aligned, so “bussing” is clearly not being used with its normal meaning. But, since this is her first game, and she subbed in at Night, did she get exposed to mafia-aligned lingo, and use it without realising the implications?
Snickers continued to express suspicion of Chronos; see [post=12834350]post 1547[/post]. She raises a question about which canon was being followed (if any) and call Treebeard weird. (Which he is, of course. Just not the most weird.) She continues to express suspicion of Treebeard in [post=12835960]post 1628[/post], and then places a vote (see the next post.)
In [post=12837060]post 1642[/post], on realising she’d been confusing Treebeard with Tom Bombadil, begins to rethink her Chipacabra vote, finally rescinding the vote in [post=12837980]post 1655[/post].
To close out Day 2, she clarified a point for Chronos in [post=12841288]post 1685[/post], then voted Ed in [post=12843361]post 1773[/post], on the grounds that SE outed Chronos and possibly identified other power roles.
My overall impression is that there were a couple of things that made me uneasy, specifically the rather smudge-filled post 1431 and the use of the word “bussing” in 1537.
I won’t now be able to get back to the review until after Dusk, as I have a 5pm deadline today for a job application.