Loving Sex, Happiness in Mateship? Or Abomination? - Long

Watching my MIL open her mother’s day presents today reminded me of some of the strange gifts I have received over the years.

Like when I was 10 and my Grandmother gave me a hot pink tulle nightie. Very sexy (it was the 80’s) but not really appropriate for a 10 year old.

Or my 18th Birthday gift from mum.

Some background to set the scene: I had gone to Uni interstate and my parents had arranged for me to board at a Lutheran College (it also housed the Lutheran Seminary). There I was 17 years old and my first taste of freedom, I’d never been allowed out past 9pm previously, I’d never touched alcohol much less had a serious boyfriend. The Lutherans owned most of the vineyards in the state so alcohol was plentiful and cheap, and the boys were friendly. I did a lot of growing up there.

Now in Australia when you turn 18 you are legally an adult – drinking, voting and all that. So my mum decided it was time to educate me in the facts of life (bit late mum we learnt it in primary school). Anyway full of good intentions she sends me for my 18th birthday, care of my college friends a book entitled

“Loving Sex, Happiness in Mateship.” by Dr. Richmond Rikard-Bell.

The card enclosed stated -
“Honey, This book is for instruction at the appropriate time not experimentation. Your daggy traditional Mum.”

Through my 3 years at the college I never lived the book down.

That was many years ago now and I had almost forgotten the book until it came to light when we last moved house (as these things eventually do). Leechboy pulled it out and perused it with interest. I would like to share the following info he found with my fellow Dopers:

Section 13 – Subjects of Controversy
Chapter 72. The Most Passionate Sexual Embrace

Please bear with me whilst I quote some passages:
The Limits of Normal
“When a man and woman make love, providing the anal or back passage opening is excluded nearly all embraces are normal.” Then goes onto explain that Sodomy is derived from Sodom the evil city destroyed by God’s wrath in the Old Testament.

The Most Daring Normal Embrace
“The most passionate natural and healthy embrace, whether from male to female or vice versa, is the genital kiss.” Leechboy starts sending up hasty prayers of thanks for that :slight_smile: There is a very sedate description of what exactly a genital kiss is.

Evidence of Normality
Compares human sex to animals having sex – to make the point whilst it is OK for males to perform the genital kiss on females it is highly unusual “in the wild” for females to do the male. Leechboy is now getting worried.

3 pages follow of very tedious reading highlighting the importance of making sure that you don’t get so excited by the passionate embrace that you think to experiment with sodomy.

Finally to close the good Doctor has this to say:

The Danger of an Abomination
“The genital kiss has been described as part love play, and as a prelude to sexual intercourse.
So called ‘oral sex’ where the embraces are used as coital substitutes is advised against. Couples have to make up their own minds, but I am not convinced that such embraces when used as a substitute for intercourse do not border on being abominations.”

So In closing I would like to thank my mum for what is possibly the oddest gift I have ever received. I should also like at this point recommend the reader get out there and practice some abomination :smiley:

What is this, some sort of Christianized Kama Sutra?

Unfortunately, I think that “genital kisses” are technically sodomy as well. I’m sure the good doctor is aware of this–that’s why he warns against the “abomination” of oral sex. Apparently in his mind the sin is in the climax.

Too funny! I’m sure your mum meant well, but shudder.

What a joy!

Maybe they should give couples a multiple choice exam on what they should and shouldn’t do in the marital bed, before allowing them to get a marriage certificate?!

It reminds me of all the wonderful stuff at http://www.christiananswers.net

Reading that, I’m pretty certain that some of the things I’ve done would send the good Doctor into shock.

I love books like this. Best. Comedy. Ever.

Ya gotta love the “passionate embrace” phrase. It sounds like the type of book that my parents may have owned.

I tried to find anything on the web for this book, and all I could find was an add in the March 2001 newsletter of the St. George Division of General Practice. (This is a 6-page pdf, and the ad is on the last page.)

The sentence isn’t finished, so I’m not sure what it’s unlike. There is even a picture of a couple engaged in the passionate embrace. There is a phone number and email address in case you want to get an updated copy. Unfortunately, the website listed doesn’t work.

I think it’s sweet that your mom doesn’t want you to perform any abominations. :stuck_out_tongue:

Is your mom still around? Is she the type you could have a chuckle with over this, so many years later?

Probably not.

Leechy, I’m more worried about the pink nightie me’self! Whatever you do, don’t wear THAT while you’re snuggled up under the doona with Leechboy checking-out the ‘diagrams’ in the book. T’would surely result in some horrendous abominations being performed!!!

Pretty much but it only covers about 10 positions as such. The rest of it lectures on morality/ethical type stuff.

Personally I never made it past the first chapter which states that a woman should be a virgin when she gets married but that it makes the wedding night far more enjoyable for her partner if her hymen is already broken!!! WTF?

Leechboy however can take far more crap than I and got through to the good stuff.

**JeffB ** interesting that you found the info in a General Practice Newsletter.

I questioned my Mum about where she’d gotten the book from and she told me that Dad’s surgery gave them out to couples seeking marriage counseling. If nothing else at least the couples could read it and laugh together.

No probably about it - that’s a definitely not. She just wouldn’t get it.

kambuckta no abominations could be performed whilst looking at the diagrams - the married couple (the married bit was pointed out frequently) who posed for the shots wear swimsuits throughout. All the other diagrams are boring graphs of such exciting things as orgasm levels, premature ejaculation scales etc.

You have to weigh your premature ejaculations on a scale? There’s a concept to move me right past premature ejaculation straight to impotence. :stuck_out_tongue:

Don’t worry yojimboguy there is a couple of graphs on impotence too. :slight_smile:

Well, I hope so, because people who follow that book too closely are gonna need 'em. :smiley:

Well for those of you who are interested I have a picture of Dr. Richmond Rikard-Bell (the author of this abomination:)) and his missus.

yojimboguy as this thread seems to be causing you some performance related problems it is perhaps best if you don’t open the link. :stuck_out_tongue:

Y’know, on a purely technical level, one has to admire the delicacy with which this dude writes. To treat such a potent subject in such a way as to stir no arousal whatsoever is, in a way, a pretty amazing achievement.

But yeah, as I read I’m thinking it’s a good thing I’m an atheist.

That pic has SO brightened up my day! They look just like something out of Carry On Loving

This evidence is interesting, but of course, it will never stand up in court.

[sub]Yes, I bumped this thread just for that. I’ve been having a bad day and I needed the chuckles.[/sub]