Dumbfuck, how do you think I got this job?
Really? That’s just… pathetic.
I promise to work the shift key from now on.
The people, who today are generally identified as caucasion, west eurasion or simply as ‘white’, are native to Europe. Their ancestors over the past 10,000 or so years were predominantly from Europe.
Maori weren’t necessarily the first to NZ, the Moriori may well have been. Nonetheless, it’s generally accepted that they are native to New Zealand. They have shared geographic ancestry there over the past 1000 years. People in europe have ancestry there going back for significantly longer.
It for one isn’t factual, since a third world slum does not involve people as rich as the minorities in this country. There is nothing here like the slums of a third world (or even second world) country. It is quite clear that you are merely referring to all people of (modern) Asian and African decent in your remarks, and using slum as a derogatory term against such.
I honestly don’t know why anyone is engaging you at all. The only real thing to do in this thread is to be like Miller and mock you for your racism.
i’m sure going to lose sleep on that one. tsk-tsk. mock away.
I think you mean descent not decent. Anyway, he’s right to be aggrieved at these kinds of outrages, brought about by misguided and negligent political decisions.
You’re not obligated to answer. But if you don’t provide an credible alternative explanation, most of us will assume the reason is racism. And the fact that you avoid following through on a statement you made will cause most of use to assume cowardice as well.
oh my, assume all you want. i didn’t start this thread.
No, they weren’t. For example, the Celts moved in about 500 B.C. Alot are even newer then that.
Don’t care. They may have been there longer then the whites, but if they didn’t get there first they’re not the natives. In this case your wrong. The Moriori are probably a Maori offshoot. The idea that they predated them has been discredited for decades. The Icelandic are the natives of Iceland cause they were there first. The Japanese are not the natives of Hokido because they weren’t. It’s simple you get a breeding group there first you get to be the natives. If someone beats you there especially if they’re still around (The Ainu, The Native Americans, The Basque.) then you aren’t.
Surely one reason would be that, in the case of the UK and the US, the most dangerous places can be predicted by the ethnicity?
i wonder what you intend to achieve by verifying “nativeness.” a person settles somewhere and goes native. that’s it. well, not all. there are chinatowns everywhere.
LIES !
(this added because the board doesn’t tolerate messages in allcaps)
I thought you pledged to use the shift button.
not always true. the most dangerous places are those that have the greatest poverty incidence and the least reach of law. but then london doesn’t fit into that model, does it? some part of it do.
you are being ignored, monkey.
Not true. Look at examples of east asian or jewish migrants living in poverty in the US. Low crime rates.
People made false statments. I supplied truth. that is all. If in doing so I also attack the belief that newcomer have anyless right to move in than the ancestors of those who currently live there then that would be a nice addition.
People seek out what’s familliar. Ethnic enclave help the transistion into a new culture. “Chinatowns” only last when there are obstacles to intergration, a continual influx of new immigrants or money to be made from “exoticness”.
Ha!
I guess you won’t see this, then. I don’t normally mock posters as much as I am doing you, but fucking A, you do deserve it. The shift key thing, though minor, is indicative of your willful ignorance and cowardice. There has been several questions directed to you in this very thread that you have not answered. I will not speak for my for other posters, but I will reiterate my own question.
You claimed that “much of the US and europe is starting to look like an afro-asian slum.” How much? Do you see immigration as developing enclaves, or is this an unstoppable horde?
‘People seek out what’s familliar. Ethnic enclave help the transistion into a new culture. “Chinatowns” only last when there are obstacles to intergration, a continual influx of new immigrants or money to be made from “exoticness”.’
…and long-time settlers and natives can still have problems integrating. hence, ethnic-induced violence. i mean, an immigrant of less than one year doesn’t look very inclined towards crime, does he?