French President Macron recently visited China and met with Xi. When he got back to France, he made a statement about Europe’s role in any disputes between China and Taiwan. Among other things he said (translated to English, not by me):
The worst thing would be to think that we Europeans must become followers on this topic and adapt to the American rhythm or a Chinese overreaction.
Reportage on this statement includes the phrase “third pole” in the dispute as an appropriate role for Europe. Americans and other Europeans have criticized this view as being too soft on China’s aggressive stance about the status of Taiwan.
Leaving aside Macron’s personal view for the moment, I think it could be very useful and effective for Europe (if it can unite on any one viewpoint) to act as a truly neutral third party, with some economic clout, to mitigate the tension that seems inevitable in this area. The US is not neutral, despite having given in to many of China’s demands about diplomatic status of Taiwan. China is certainly not neutral. Other parts of the world are either resisting China’s encroachments or welcoming their economic bounty with open arms. Isn’t there a useful place for an independent and non-US-centric, balancing third pole?
I frankly don’t know how this might work, and I would welcome any ideas and discussions here about that.
If it matters, I think China is completely wrong in this matter, and that the Republic of Taiwan should be accorded full diplomatic recognition by all nations and the United Nations as the government of Taiwan (and not China). So I’m not neutral either. I still think a neutral third party can be useful in at least keeping the status quo disagreement on peaceful terms.