Ok, I’ve just gone and reread the entire thread. I really hope I get the coding right 'cause I’m not writing this again.
peekercpa - Your posts still annoy the life out of me, but as has been pointed out by another, it would be unfair and unwise to lynch a person I didn’t highly suspect of being scum.
Nanook of the North Shore - I believe we butted heads in the last Simpleton, there I was intentionally abrasive to get as much of a reaction out of as many as I could. While I think it was a successful strategy I went back and read it later and didn’t like how I sounded. This is supposed to be fun and pissing people off intentionally isn’t it. I suspect our ‘past’ convinced you that was the player you were responding to these past two pages. I don’t have a scum read on you yet.
Special ed - You declaring that a player isn’t looking for scum is pretty ridiculous. Everyone does it in their own way, you don’t have to post to read. You’ve been on the soapbox early and often about every facet of scum strategy, perhaps to help town newbies, perhaps to paint in their minds your own innocence. I don’t have a good scum read on you yet either though.
Willthekittensurvive? - You’re new and you messed up, whether or not that means you’re scum is hard to tell. I’m not convinced right now enough to vote for you, however, tomorrow is another day.
straggler - Your ‘everyone vote in the last 24 hours and lynch anyone who changes it’ idea was anti-town, but posing a bad idea isn’t necessarily scummy. What began to bother me was that your posts are full of absurd flailing illustrated beautifully here, here and here which become all the clearer when called on it by Natlaw and seem all the more ridiculous.
Your List of Suspicion also rubs me the wrong way and unlike you I’ll provide a explanation why. You didn’t show your work in how your suspects were selected. Though you suspected us you didn’t vote for anyone until last night and you voted for me only after two other people did. Making your list public in your mind absolves you of bandwagon guilt. If one of the people on your list gets close to a lynch you can say ‘he was on my list so it seems rational to help push the lynch’ which is exactly what you DID say, however, what you’re actually doing is surrendering your final judgment to a mob you can hide in.
I have no idea why you think, if lynched, your vote is ‘100% authentic’ or even what that means. If you get lynched and turn up town, everyone here is responsible for their own vote and it apparently never occurred to you that a lynched townie can be wrong.
Once again your logic is tragic but that doesn’t appear to stop your random accusation generator.
I’m fully aware I’ll be accused of OMGUS voting, but I don’t care.
unvote peekercpa
vote straggler
