[QUOTE=DiggitCamara]
Actually, I’d gladly hear that point, since that’s the only reason why I suspect you (as of now, at least). And it was the one that made Rachm slip under my suspici-O-meter, since it allowed him to keep fluiddruid as his vote on Day 3.
[/QUOTE]
Okay, I’ll go through my thought process in that vote switch as best as I can. That said, I’m not going to bother to reiterate my points about why I thought dnooman was the likeliest crumb. Why? Simply because I’ve already wasted enough posts rehashing that. If there’s a part of my reasoning you don’t understand, I’ll take it on that way.
Going into the third day, IIRC, my general suspicions, in no particular order, were fluiddruid, Projammer, CaerieD, and Lightnin’; that list was actually fairly consistent with the general town sentiment at the time. Based on the breadcrumb discussion, prior to going back and doing my own re-read, the idea that fluiddruid was a scum crumb was enticing and looked solid enough, which was enough to boost her above the other three, so I voted for her; however, I made it clear that I was still VERY suspicious of Projammer.
Then came discussion about whether fluiddruid was being framed, so I unvoted her while I reconsidered. When I revoted for fluiddruid, I also made my point clear that, while I was actually less suspcious of her overall, I could not ignore the potential breadcrumb and I figured we’d get her that day, and lynch Projammer the next. So far, so good, right?
Well, thanks to her silver tongue (which almost got her saved the next day, even), I was filled with self-doubt about whether it was or was not the right vote and decided to go back and re-read all of Kyrie’s posts and look at the potential crumbs and I was surprised by what I saw. I wish I’d done that in the first place, because it never would have brought this up. As I’d stated in my vote, that it was the crumb potential the pushed fluiddruid above Projammer, with that compelling evidence lost, I corrected my “icky” feeling by voting for Projammer, whom I now had the strongest suspicion of being scum. What I DIDN’T account for, was CaerieD following my vote and that I would get blamed for that.
So here’s my thoughts. If I were scum, why would I make such a bold and obvious attempt to save fluiddruid that would, at best, result in a coin toss and result in a massive amount of suspicion to be cast upon me? Why am I being “held to task” for switching my vote when I provided reasoning (even if you don’t agree with it), while several others plainly ignored the crumb and voted earlier (much like Lemur)? Look at the results of the witchhunt from the Projammer bandwagon… Lightnin’ and almost CaerieD if not for Idle’s persistence on SCL (…I still can’t figure out why she was night-killed).
The scum have been playing us, using the fact that **Projammer ** was up against scum to try and put blame on various people which resulted in one townie lynch (Lightnin’) and almost that of CaerieD. Interesting that when Lemur was up and Millit, Hal, and Cookies didn’t vote for him, there’s no push to get them lynched in the way that those “responsible” for Projammer’s death have been pursued.