[QUOTE=DiggitCamara]
I know I’m not convincing anyone but myself, but, since you’ve already brought up the “Contradictions are an important scum tell”-meme, let’s look at two posts from dnooman:
post #243: “We should only refer to ourselves as town, never anything more specific unless absolutely necessary. We don’t need to narrow down the possible pool of power roles for the Mafia.”
post #495:“Bloody hell. The thought that Lightnin’ might be a mason occurred to me. If he is, and the other masons were those that were defending him, we’re in deep shit.”
So: to justify the crucial vote swing against percypercy, he contradicted his earlier post by guessing that Lightnin’ is a mason.
[/QUOTE]
This was not a contradiction, you just misread my meaning. I was referring to Hal Briston’s “I’m just a plain townie” claim. Nobody should claim vanilla town unless they’re about to swing and it’s true. Obviously power roles should not lie about being plain town, and the actual plain town should not let the Mafia know that they are vanilla. The Mafia wants to kill power roles you see. I was referring to people talking about their own roles.
My thought that Lightnin’ could be a mason was legitimate, although in retrospect I think that was a possibly foolish conclusion.
It is not a good idea for townies to try to out power roles, I wasn’t trying to out anyone, and it appears that so far no one has been outed. However, if did not reveal my reason for changing my vote I would be either a) being secretive and therefore not helpful, or b) I would have had to lie, which is never a good idea for town to do.
This is by no means my full disclosure defense, I’ll save that for when and if I have a date with the gallows . The way I see it now, the more Mafia that pile on my wagon the better. I’ve gotten a pretty good reaction from my posts, and I think that will prove to be enlightening when I’m dead.

